So does she.
The ugly goes through and through.
I was thinking that it belongs in 1930s Moscow.
This is true. The irony is the “gig economy” innovators still support her or her side no matter.
They know her rhetoric is empty and she will be pliant.
She’s a nasty piece of work. Nuff said
They are also known as Luddites.
Everything comes around into fashion again. And sadly, class warfare is at the top of the charts again.
Here’s the biggest problem for Hillary: she may have trouble attracting younger voters like what Barack Obama did in 2008 or Bill Clinton did in 1992 and 1996. Meanwhile, the most viable candidates on the Republican side in 2016 will be between 45 and 54 years old.
I thought Hillary born in the 30’s......
Her a$$ is in 1930’s America.
And it spreads across 1940’s America, 1950’s America and 1960’s America, all the way to the present day where liberal Oompa-Loompas shoot it up with novocaine, cover it with vaseline and shoehorn it into pastel kevlar pantsuits. “Please breathe out, my queen.”
I would bet a fair amount of money that she has no idea what most of those apps are. It is likely that she is reading what a speechwriter told her to say and I’d bet she had to be taught to pronounce the names, too.
... and when was the last time she had to ride in a cab? Uber or other?
It is a supreme irony of modern American life that the political movement that terms itself “progressive” is, in the economic realm at least, increasingly passionate about the status quo.
The word “progress” appears in the Constitution, exactly once:
The Congress shall have power . . . To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries . . . (Article I, Section 8)So the idea of progress is one of "the blessings of liberty” which the framers sought to “secure . . . to ourselves and our posterity.”Thus it is a unique form of American “conservatism” which clings to an old-time religion of freedom to do things differently than they have been done in the past, and hope for progress of, by, and for the American people.
Our “conservatism” is progressive, and our “progressivism” is backward looking, prepared to countenance price controls to prevent change - because “progressives” distrust change and do not trust “the progress of science and useful arts.”
Thus do “progressives” fear and oppose change, and “liberals" oppose freedom.