I would ‘dovetail’ this article, with a request to the reader, to go and find Judge Andrew Napolitano’s article, “What is a right?”
Evolution does not equate any of the human socio-economics, that are part of human history. Evolution, as it was originally defined, are ‘steps’ of individual species, changing to a changing environment.
The human race is only one species, and does not react to an environment, but has engineered it’s own environment through construction and automation. At our base, we are still either in the flesh, Cain or Abel, and equally proficient, as we choose, hence, “the human condition”.
As such, it is WE who have created myriad societies, and have found it is good, both for the individuals, and for society’s permanence, whether deemed by shaman, rabbi, or priest (any label of sorts), for the joining of a man and a woman. Daughters for the household, and the key to future generations, and, Sons for the professions of the houses, the security of that society when threatened, the lording over as required, and for the element necessary to produce those future generations. Such, homosexuality has been, and still is, a threat to these things mentioned above. No future generations, no societal security when threatened.
Homohood competes with normal family, but so in a sense does virtuous singlehood. We have to dig even deeper for the root of the evil.
At bottom (pun may or may not be taken as desired) it is a pageant of hate conjoined with the devoted passion of sex, and that is where its most pernicious side is exercised. These people inevitably get maliciously dishy in some context, even if it isn’t in the glaring public eye. Vanity can cause the tendency to be displaced, but it cannot eliminate it.
I went to his site and found this one
My Top 10 Legal Stories of 2012
Published on Dec 12, 2012
-- snip --
6. Same-Sex Marriage
In a very famous case called Loving vs Virginia, the Lovings were a bi-racial, opposite sex couple who got married in the District of Columbia and then moved back to their native Virginia. The police broke into the bedroom of their home in the middle of the night and arrested them because Virginia law prohibited bi-racial couples. The case made it to the Supreme Court and the ruling invalidated the law that prohibits bi-racial couples, but it also said your right to choose a mate is a fundamental liberty with which the state cannot interfere. Obviously the case did not involve same-sex marriage but the language is clear and that language has been undisturbed by the Supreme Court since the opinion came down in 1968. Expect the same rationale in the same-sex marriage cases.
-- snip --
Perhaps that is the one you are talking about?
I will do a search in Townhall.com and see if it was posted under a different title