Posted on 07/10/2015 5:12:07 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
Muuch of the national debate over racism in the aftermath of last months mass murder in Charleston, S.C., has focused on the South and its strange and sometimes jarring nostalgia for the Confederacy. And yet tucked away in the Pacific Northwest of the United States is a vicious group that most people have never heard of but the nations most virulent online racists know well (among them, accused South Carolina murderer Dylann Roof, who wrote about the group in his now-infamous manifesto).
The group is called the Northwest Front and its final solution to the race "problem," if you will, is to expel non-white people from the Pacific Northwest and to establish a mono-racial republic there.
Racism knows no region, its safe to say. While the Pacific Northwest can abstain from the debate on the removal of traitorous colors from the Capitol groundsOregon was the last state in the Union before the Civil Wars outbreak, after allthe region bears a racial legacy tinted by an ignorance, a decades-old vision of minority-free lands, as stark as any in the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
They say that like it’s a bad thing.
Why is it that the author from Politico, who sports a Master’s from Columbia, seems to be willfully ignorant of the real reason the Three-Fifths Clause existed? To deny further power to the slave-owning states.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:
In 1942, 24-year-old Byrd joined the Ku Klux Klan (KKK), whose parades in Matoaka, West Virginia, he had witnessed in his childhood. He was unanimously elected Exalted Cyclops, or leader, of his local chapter.[8]
Byrd, in his autobiography, attributed the beginnings of his political career to this incident, although he lamented that they involved the Klan. According to Byrd, a KKK official told him "You have a talent for leadership, Bob... The country needs young men like you in the leadership of the nation." Byrd recalls that "suddenly lights flashed in my mind! Someone important had recognized my abilities! I was only 23 or 24 years old, and the thought of a political career had never really hit me. But strike me that night, it did."[4] He participated in the KKK during World War II, holding the titles Kleagle (recruiter) and Exalted Cyclops [the top officer in the local Klan unit]. He did not serve in the military during the war, working instead as a welder in a Baltimore, Maryland shipyard, where he helped build warships.[citation needed]
Byrd commented on the 1945 controversy about racially integrating the military. Byrd, when he was 28 years old, wrote to segregationist Senator Theodore Bilbo, of Mississippi, vowing never to serve in such a military:
"Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.[5]"
He had earlier written "I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side".[6][7]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Byrd#Participation_in_the_Ku_Klux_Klan
__________________________________________________________
From the Washington Post:
"Byrd said in the Dec. 11, 1945, letter -- which would not become public for 42 more years with the publication of a book on blacks in the military during World War II by author Graham Smith -- that he would never fight in the armed forces "with a Negro by my side." Byrd added that, "Rather I should die a thousand times, and see old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.."..."
"during the general election campaign, Byrd's GOP opponent uncovered a letter Byrd had handwritten to Green, the KKK Imperial Wizard, recommending a friend as a Kleagle and urging promotion of the Klan throughout the country. The letter was dated 1946 -- long after the time Byrd claimed he had lost interest in the Klan. "The Klan is needed today as never before, and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia," Byrd wrote, according to newspaper accounts of that period. Byrd makes no mention of the letter in his new book."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/18/AR2005061801105_pf.html
For the worst pedophiles you would just have to visit newsrooms and the DNC.
The worst racists are the recent black immigrants from Africa.
Genocides occur there frequently due to racism. They understand them. An, dats black on black... he aint dark enuff/ he too light! WTF.
Africans are still too close to the earth and still too backwards. Our home grown? Want to shuck off the cloaks of civilization, the things that made America great.
Our home grown black still identify with their tribal roots.
The white guys? Hardly as embittered.
My thoughts exactly.
Sorry, the worst racists are the ones that are making a living out of it.
I wonder if it ever occurred to the author that the organization “La Raza” (translation: THE RACE) might be racist.
It’s very simple.
Southern states wanted only free people counted for purposes of taxation, but wanted slaves included for purposes of representation.
Northern states obviously wanted the reverse. They compromised on 3/5 for both.
You don’t need to go into their neighborhoods to get that feeling. Standing next to a black person in a checkout line and you get that same feeling regardless the neighborhood.
Just see gentrified Seattle. And there you have ‘em
Some of that feeling could be hatred of whites.
And the difference is?
Why don’t they kick those racists in Seattle and Portland out of the United States.
We have it all wrong, we need to deport these racists and give their homes to the illegals.
> For the worst pedophiles you would just have to visit newsrooms and the DNC.
I suspect gay marriage lists would work just as well and have many crossover members
If The Southern Poverty Law Center is against them, I guess I will probably be for them.
In our countrys recent history weve celebrated diversity in our population as if it were a good thing, but one look at world history will show you that no country with a diverse population of different races, languages, and religion has long survived.
Countries dont naturally form with a diverse population and when in the past theyve occurred its usually been as a result of armed conquest. These unnaturally formed countries have either melded together into a single population made up of one mixed race with one language and one religion or theyve come apart, and theyve usually come apart with extreme violence. The longer these diverse populations are forced to coexist with one another without mixing and becoming one, the more the hatred grows among them and the more violently they break apart, but break apart they will, or genocide will settle the issue once and for all.
They referenced the SPLC.
Again.
*sigh*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.