[2ndDivisionVet]

You guys should've thought of that before you pushed for counterfeit marriage.

[Vendome]

These guys are against Polygamy?

Bigots!

[P-Marlowe]

Bi-sexuals can’t have their dignity unless they can marry at least one person of each sex.

And what about tri-sexuals and quadrasexuals - people who have a sexual attraction to people of both sexes and transexuals of both sexes.

It’s all about dignity and happiness.

That’s what the Supreme Court says.

[RginTN]

So a bi-sexual who loves a man & a woman can’t marry them? That’s hate!
//s

[Captain Compassion]

One of the problems with polygyny is that it non egalitarian. The rich guy can have many of the most beautiful wives leaving poorer males few options beyond homosexuality or prostitutes.

[golux]

Naturally the Abrahamic response is:

They get all the oil, all the UN sympathy, all the love of a Muslim Mombasan Marxist President, all the "Affirmative action," all the polygamy and all the babes...

And WE get to continue to have the privilege of cutting off the ends of our shmeckles?"

[BlackAdderess]

When a ma-an loves a ... um...
hmmm.....

[CrazyIvan]

I think you should have at least one mate from each of the 50 some sexual persuasions.

[tophat9000]

It will be incest next.... they have zero ground to prohibit gay incestuous marriage...

[manc]

So they want their kind of marriage and yet deny others to their kind of marriage. Now correct me if I ma wrong but the last few years those who opposed their contracts were called bigots, so what does that make them?

[cymbeline]

What they’re wanting is monetary and other privileges granted by the government. Do we want to subsidize this and whatever comes after it? Do non-polygamists want to pay polygamists with money and privilege?

[no-to-illegals]

are you Nutts? You knew it was the plan ... NUTS

[SevenofNine]

Come think of it

Men why you want three mother in laws LOL!

[GraceG]

We should take their liberal agenda and force them to swallow the whole damned thing until they either puke or explode

[ronnietherocket3]

Here’s a 2012 study, for example, that discovered “significantly higher levels of rape, kidnapping, murder, assault, robbery and fraud in polygynous cultures.”

Hmm, homosexual relationships, for example, have "significantly higher levels of AIDS, syphillis, domestic violence and infidelity than heterosexual relationships".

And: “by shifting male efforts from seeking wives to paternal investment, institutionalized monogamy increases long-term planning, economic productivity, savings and child investment.”

Homosexual relationships cut off the paternal investment, lack institutionalized monogamy, lack long-term planning, and (most likely) have no child investment.

“The truth is that we don’t know what a wealthy Western society like America would look like with polygamous marriage because conservatism has prevented that society from existing.”

This same conservatism also prohibited homosexual relationships so I have difficulty determining the argument here. However, polygyny at least does not violate the procreative aspect of sex; homosexual activity does.

...when a high-status man takes two wives (and one man taking many wives, or polygyny, is almost invariably the real-world pattern),

In polygyny, the man in question still has to place some value on women, in a homosexual relationship he has to place none. Usually because of wars, crime and risky behavior, there are fewer men in society.

The above are not arguments in favor of polygyny (or polyandry).

[Marie]

I keep asking Leftists ‘So what’s wrong with gay incest marriage? They can’t reproduce, so there are no worries about genetic issues with offspring... You can’t say that it’s the ‘ick factor’ because that’s what a lot of people say about gay sex. If it’s all about ‘love’ and the fact that ‘it’s nobody’s business’ then why wouldn’t gay incest marriage be alright?”

Just throwing every freaking argument back in their faces.

The typical response is ‘gross!’ and ‘that’s sick’... No actual logic to be applied.

So it’s alright to discriminate against ONE kind of marriage, but not to discriminate against GAY marriage... and why?

We discriminate ALL THE FREAKING TIME.

[driftless2]

On numerous lib websites (DummyUnderground) and talk forums this debate is now going on. Naturally, many of the pro homo marriage people are saying polygamy is all wrong. And the proponents of polygamy are rightfully calling the anti-polygamists hypocrites and haters. Get out the popcorn...fun to watch.

[backwoods-engineer]

I think a group of clever individuals, say, 50 - 500 in number, could beat the whole system by claiming they ALL want to be 'wed' into a single union. I'm not proposing something perverse; the Supremes made marriage into just another government function. So, couples could exist in holy matrimony within such a government-defined structure. But there could be advantages to this, and we might be able to beat FedGov at its own game.

In the New Amerika a "group marriage" means:

• They ALL can pool their income, easily placing them in the strata of income where a high-flying tax lawyer could be hired to beat taxes like George Soros;

• They can together create a massive cash pool to pay for healthcare for ALL the members, and with doctors, dentists, and hospitals, cash is rewarded with steep discounts;

• They ALL can file one collective tax return, saving thousands in double-taxing, corporate taxes, FICA, etc.

• They ALL can share the dead members' Social Security checks.;

• If they are a productive company, providing a service or a product for profit, they can claim to be a "family business" and be exempt from such things as employee taxes and other federal nonsense. of for now.

There's probably a lot more advantages, like capital staying "in the family" for decades, but those are all I can think

Yeah, maybe whole towns should "get married" now. Since "marriage" means nothing in America now except your tax status in the eyes of FedGov and StateGov, maybe to beat them, we join them...

[gusty]

“Heather Has Two Mommies” will lead to “Heather Has Three Mommies And A Big Bearded Imam Daddy.”

[kearnyirish2]

That’s right; rather than allow the deviants to pretend thet are on par with normal married people, I want polygamy allowed to clarify what a sham government-sanctioned “marriage” has become. I want people marrying pets, inanimate objects, ghosts of former loved ones - with all the government benefits, of course. I can get the exemption on my tax return for the broom I intend to marry...

[joshua c]

The Supreme Court undefined marriage. Its a free for all now.