Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jonathan Zimmerman: Ted Cruz is not crazy
The Dallas Morning News ^ | July 8, 2015 | Professor Jonathan Zimmerman, NYU

Posted on 07/08/2015 5:30:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

So let’s suppose that the Supreme Court had struck down Obamacare and same-sex marriage last month instead of upholding both. Would Texas Sen. and presidential aspirant Ted Cruz be demanding a constitutional amendment requiring the Court’s justices to stand for election in order to keep their jobs? And would liberals be rallying to the defense of the Court, and condemning any effort to alter its supposedly august traditions?

Of course not. Throughout our political history, the team that loses in the Supreme Court has tried to alter the court’s power and influence. This battle isn’t about deep judicial principles or timeless heritage; it’s about whose ox gets gored.

That’s why Republicans during the Civil War proposed abolishing the entire Supreme Court and replacing it with a new one. The Court was still led by Roger Taney, author of the notorious Dred Scott decision on slavery. Creative GOP legislators pointed out that the Constitution simply provided for “one Supreme Court”; it didn’t say anything about how the Court should be constituted....

(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; obamacare; supremecourt; tedcruz

1 posted on 07/08/2015 5:30:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Let the state legislatures vote on retention of supreme court justices.

The court might not be so quick to step on the tails of those who hold their fate in their hands.


2 posted on 07/08/2015 5:35:41 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If only Ted had advocated ‘packing the court’ like FDR wanted to do in 37, the Communist Morning News would be more supportive.


3 posted on 07/08/2015 5:39:28 PM PDT by corbe (mystified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

We the people should be able to nullify decisions like the gay marriage decision. They defied the will of 40 states.


4 posted on 07/08/2015 5:40:46 PM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Let the state legislatures vote on retention of supreme court justices. The court might not be so quick to step on the tails of those who hold their fate in their hands.

I like your idea.

Originally, the Bill of Rights did not apply to the States. The Supreme Court had no power over the states.

The 14th Amendment ruined the balance of power. Something needs to be done to reclaim our freedoms.

5 posted on 07/08/2015 5:45:20 PM PDT by donna (Polls are mob rule . . . faked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If the justices upheld their oaths to the Constitution, Cruz would not be advocating a change to the Constitution to keep them in check. You NYU clown.


6 posted on 07/08/2015 5:46:09 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Robert Zimmerman - Video- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ex-m-eEKsg


7 posted on 07/08/2015 5:49:24 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Let the state legislatures vote on retention of supreme court justices.

We had that for US Senators until the 17th. Now the bastards have more money than god to get re elected.

8 posted on 07/08/2015 5:49:34 PM PDT by hadaclueonce (It is not heaven, it is Iowa. Everyone gets a "Corn Check")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“This battle isn’t about deep judicial principles or timeless heritage; it’s about whose ox gets gored.”

Our ox is the deep judicial principles and the timeless heritage, and our ox keeps getting gored.


9 posted on 07/08/2015 6:05:46 PM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Copycat bump for what I think is a very good idea.


10 posted on 07/08/2015 6:45:14 PM PDT by WhoisAlanGreenspan?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

BINGO.


11 posted on 07/08/2015 7:05:57 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; MountainDad; ...
    Ted Cruz Ping!

    If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
    Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!

    CRUZ or LOSE!

12 posted on 07/08/2015 8:19:53 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson