Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FlingWingFlyer

Ignore them is what I would do. Put me in prison or shoot me for my beliefs. It wouldn’t be the first time in history that has happened. Those ‘libertarians’ who declared that gay marriage doesn’t hurt anyone else will soon find out how wrong they are. Just ask the bakers and photographers who are losing their businesses, and clergy who will now be forced to participate in these ‘weddings’ or see their churches shut down for hate crimes. This will not end with the gays. Other groups are already lined up for their turn to be validated. I am grossly sickened today.


19 posted on 06/26/2015 8:17:15 AM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Sioux-san
 
 
The legislative process in this nation is overthrown and TRUE civil rights are on the way out. The queers are already spiking the football and rubbing our noses in it all over the internet, showing that this is far from over yet. There's more destruction to come. The floodgates are now open for every leftist agenda to surge forward with confidence.
 
 

135 posted on 06/26/2015 9:31:32 AM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Sioux-san

libertarians have all supported what the communist, and socialist wanted. They instead infiltrated the ranks of the GOP as the communists infiltrated the ranks of the Dem party.

They both worked hand in hand, and yet many cowardly republicans won’t say a damn thing or stop them.


212 posted on 06/26/2015 1:30:38 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Sioux-san

People have failed to understand, in spite of the history of lawfare you cite, and the examples of people accused of “hate crimes” by our northern neighbors, that the “gay” rights movement is an existential threat to freedom.
~~~~~
The opinion of the court is absolutely wrong in framing the question as being whether homosexuals have the right to marry like everyone else. Of course they do - which is why the court wishes to frame it that way. The question is whether you can call the sexual union of two people of the same sex marriage.
All this re-defining of words, and dehumanizing those who disagree with the new definitions, is the issue. It will not end well.


251 posted on 06/27/2015 1:46:02 PM PDT by Apogee (Just when I thought I was All done with sleepless contemplation of jus ad bellum and jus in bello,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson