Skip to comments.
Study: Here's how stoned, drunk drivers differ
Fox News ^
| 06.24.2015
| Elizabeth Armstrong Moore
Posted on 06/24/2015 2:04:20 PM PDT by dware
When it comes to smoking marijuana and driving, many variables affect impairmentthe potency of the drug, the tolerance of the toker, when the drug was taken, how the drug was takenmaking guidelines difficult to implement.
But with some states decriminalizing the possession of weed, the feds are investigating a pot version of the .08 breath alcohol concentration set as the legal driving limit in most of the country.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alcohol; cannabis; marijuana; pot; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
A new study by the National Institute on Drug Abuse finds that drivers with blood concentrations of 13.1 ug/L THC, which is more than twice the 5 ug/L limit in Washington and Colorado, exhibit impairment similar to those with a .08 breath alcohol concentration, reports Time.
1
posted on
06/24/2015 2:04:20 PM PDT
by
dware
To: ConservingFreedom; T-Bone Texan; shotgun; clee1
Pot Ping List!
Let me know if you want on or off!
2
posted on
06/24/2015 2:05:32 PM PDT
by
dware
(Yeah, so? What are you going to do about it?)
To: dware
Drunk drivers run stop signs.
Stoned drivers wait for them to turn green.
3
posted on
06/24/2015 2:06:53 PM PDT
by
Crazieman
(Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
To: Crazieman
To: Crazieman
5
posted on
06/24/2015 2:08:19 PM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: Crazieman
Here's how stoned, drunk drivers differThis is a great article, but I still want to know how stoned, drunk drivers differ from...what or whom???
6
posted on
06/24/2015 2:09:10 PM PDT
by
dware
(Yeah, so? What are you going to do about it?)
To: dware
Wow, that’s so incredibly horrible.
Now, compare them to people talking or texting on their phone.
I got rear ended recently by a girl answering a call on her phone.
Now compare the above to drunk drivers.
Patiently waiting.
Now compare to people ONLY using THC based product.
Patiently waiting....
7
posted on
06/24/2015 2:11:17 PM PDT
by
Tailback
To: Crazieman
To: dware
Pot smokers want to drive high.
There’s a surprise.
9
posted on
06/24/2015 2:18:41 PM PDT
by
donna
(Polls are mob rule . . . faked.)
To: dware
This is a great article, but I still want to know how stoned, drunk drivers differ from...what or whom??? How do they compare to women who fard while driving?
10
posted on
06/24/2015 2:20:31 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(If You Are Ignorant, Don't Vote!)
To: dware
"While alcohol affected both lateral acceleration (weaving speed) and lane departures per minute, marijuana alone did not"
11
posted on
06/24/2015 2:20:41 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
"While alcohol affected both lateral acceleration (weaving speed) and lane departures per minute, marijuana alone did not" The facts are that stoned drive generally have hands @ 10 & 2, 5 miles under the limit and dammit but every set of lights in the rear view is a cop! I would MUCH rather be on the road with a bunch of stoners than a bunch of drunks.
12
posted on
06/24/2015 2:30:38 PM PDT
by
dware
(Yeah, so? What are you going to do about it?)
To: donna
Pot smokers want to drive high.Nice making wild accusations, but where, exactly, did you deduce this from?
13
posted on
06/24/2015 2:31:17 PM PDT
by
dware
(Yeah, so? What are you going to do about it?)
To: dware
dammit but every set of lights in the rear view is a cop!
LOLOL
Not that I would know. My friend told me. Yea that’s the ticket.
To: dware
To a person hurt, or to the family of someone killed by an impaired driver, it doesn’t matter what substance impaired the driver, does it?
15
posted on
06/24/2015 2:35:55 PM PDT
by
Sasparilla
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
To: Tailback
I guess if someone is killed in a car accident due to an impaired driver, it’s really not going to matter much if it was a drunk or a stoner.
16
posted on
06/24/2015 2:41:44 PM PDT
by
Made In The USA
(Yes Ma'am, I said I'd like three sides of bacon with my eggs. and bacon.)
To: dware
17
posted on
06/24/2015 2:42:16 PM PDT
by
When do we get liberated?
(A socialist is a communist who realizes he must suckle the breast of Capitalism.)
To: Tailback
You got rear ended.
Last week I almost got side-swipped.
The odd thing is, the person jerked back into her lane after
nearly knocking my mirror off, and a few minutes later did
it again to someone else (missed again, but only by a little).
18
posted on
06/24/2015 2:43:26 PM PDT
by
Verbosus
(/* No Comment */)
To: dware; All
Thank you for referencing that article dware. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.
the feds [emphasis added] are investigating a pot version of the .08 breath alcohol concentration set as the legal driving limit in most of the country."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponents Argument
While such testing needs to be done to make the roads safer, the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to do these kinds of tests on drivers.
To: Sasparilla
Are you saying the death only matters if the driver was impaired??
20
posted on
06/24/2015 2:44:18 PM PDT
by
SunTzuWu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson