Posted on 06/20/2015 1:04:49 AM PDT by Crazieman
That summarizes our Left’s White Guilt perfectly.
Jesus is the answer.
(They won’t like that)
“The issue is never the issue. The issue is the revolution.”
—David Horowitz, quoting unnamed SDS leader.
If the shooter had been black, and the church members been white. The liberals would have blamed "white privileged" for causing the poor black fellow to commit the murders.
Liberals believe that Gaia, the Earth mother, gave them dominion over the Negro, and made them their protectors and guardians (in return, the Negros have to vote for them in elections).
My kid used to have some high end clearances in the USAF. I used to beg her to do what was needed to get us unto Area 51 so we could steal a UFO and make the aliens take us to their leader/home.
This is a fare saner and easier to believe thing than Bomb Boy bitching about domestic terrorism. Sort of like a hooker being upset because you paid her asking price and had sex with her.
Let me clarify...I absolutely believe he did it. I just don’t believe he did it with a straight face and hardly anyone cared.
It’s not ‘guilt’ on the left - it’s hatred.
Info babe was yapping about something, but in the background their election coverage name is being promoted...
DEMOCRACY
2016
It stuck me as being very biased toward democrats and of course we are not a democracy, but a representative republic...
Good post. Thank you.
I don’t recall Salon demanding that all blacks “answer” for the sins of DC snipers John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo who murdered 17 and critically wounded 10 mostly white innocents during their killing spree in 2002. If anything typifies the heartless, reflexive, opportunistic, calloused liberal agenda —— this is it.
The overlords always wheel out that word - “ DEMOCRACY” - as if they had an interest in mob rule by the most violent among us - sure they do . . . :-)
Oh dear..
“Consider the source” is always excellent advise.
CARSON: The heart of the matter is not guns. The heart of the matter is the heart, the heart and soul of people. This young man didn’t wake up yesterday and suddenly turn into a maniac. Clearly there have been things in his background, in his upbringing that led to the type of mentality that would allow him to do something like this. And one of the things that I think we really need to start concentrating on in this country is once again instilling the right kinds of values, particularly in our young people. We’re so busy giving away all of our values and principles for the sake of political correctness that we have people floating around out there with no solid foundation of beliefs.
RUSH: Bingo! There is no moral authority. There is no authority, period! Everything is just how somebody feels. And he’s exactly right. We have given away our values and principles for the sake of political correctness. He’s exactly right about it.
I thought that it would be interesting to offer Ben Carson’s comments and Rush Limbaugh’s take on Mr. Carson’s comments as a stark contrast to the drivel from Salon.
The left isn’t actually left-wing anymore, and it hasn’t been for a long time. They are not interested in the working class, the environment, freedom of expression, or even “civil rights.” Their ideology is centered solely on attacking Whites. Their ideology only makes sense when you take that into account.
Why do they condemn (European) Christianity, a peaceful religion for a long time now, as dangerous but not Islam, a religion that’s just as violent now as it was centuries ago?
Why do they scream bloody murder when Whites say something politically incorrect about women but are totally silent over the innumerable rapes committed by non-White males against White women?
Why do they want to disarm peaceful Whites but not black and latino gang members?
Why do they whine about “cultural appropriation” but have no problem with non-Whites dyeing their hair blond and red, trying to look White, and engaging in traditional European activities like ballet and Sheakespearian theater?
Why do they condemn Western colonization of Africa and Asia as evil and morally reprehensible, yet gleefully champion African and Asian colonization of the West through mass immigration?
Why do they support Mexican illegal aliens but consider the European refugees who “illegally” came to America as criminals?
Why do they call Whites “racists” for resisting the invasions of their homelands by foreigners yet glorify all the non-Whites who fought to keep Europeans out of their homelands?
Why do they consider every American military action against non-Whites as immoral and evil (Mexican War, Spanish war, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq) and every war waged against Whites as good and just (WWI, WWII, bombing of Serbia)?
Why do they claim Whites, and race in general, are social constructs yet aggressively promote the racial identities of non-Whites?
Why do they claim racism is hatred backed up by political power yet don’t condemn black-run, black-majority South Africa, which actively oppresses its White minority with draconian laws and violence?
Why do they call the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki war crimes, but not the bombings of Dresden and other German cities which weren’t military targets?
Why do they not have a problem with all non-White races maintaining their majorities in their own nations but foam at the mouth when Whites dare speak up against their ethnic displacement in their own countries?
Why do they care so much about the “holocaust” but not the genocide of tens of millions of Slavs at the hands of Bolshevik Jews in the USSR?
Why do they simultaneously say that Whites are a social construct, and that Whites are collectively evil as a race?
Why do they say all Whites must feel guilt for the “crimes” of their ancestors yet simultaneously say that it’s “stupid” for Whites to feel pride over the accomplishments of their ancestors, since they had nothing to do with it?
And why don’t they insist modern-day Turks, Mongols, or Arabs feel guilt over the crimes of their ancestors?
Why do they viciously condemn the racialism and nationalism of the German Reich but have no problem with Zionist Israel requiring genetic tests for its citizens and encouraging rampant nationalism in its schools?
Why are they horrified at America’s history of segregated schools yet have no problem whatsoever with Jews still having segregated schools, segregated camps, and even segregated villages for themselves to this very day?
Why do they claim race and gender aren’t biological, but homosexuality is completely biological?
Why do they claim to support science and simultaneously claim that human biodiversity and evolutionary psychology are evil, and that studies in these areas should be shut down?
Why do they claim to support freedom of speech and expression and simultaneously work to end freedom of speech and expression with “hate speech” legislation?
Why do they call nationalism an “outdated 19th century ideology” but not Marxism, or even liberalism?
Why is mocking Christianity considered free speech but mocking Judaism or Islam “hate speech?”
Why are they always going on about black slavery but not the frequent enslavement of White populations throughout the centuries by the Moors, Mongols, and Turks? The very word “slave” is descended from Slav due to the millions of White slaves taken from Eastern Europe over the course of the centuries.
Why is it a hate crime whenever a White person attacks a non-White, but it’s never a hate crime when Whites are brutally attacked and murdered by non-Whites, even when they’re caught shouting anti-White slurs while committing the crime?
Because they hate Whites. Because THEY are racists, to use their own term against them. These seemingly contradictory opinions of theirs cease to be contradictory when you realize that their ideology is not centered around logic or objectivity, but a very simple and blunt hatred of Whites.
“The issue is never the issue. The issue is the revolution.” —David Horowitz, quoting unnamed SDS leader.
Understand that, and you will understand everything.
The bombing of German civilians during WWII was a response to the switch in German tactics from strategic targets (industrial) to terror attacks on London (VI & VII missiles).
The decision to use nuclear weapons on Japanese cities was intended to end the war. The Japanese casualties were estimated to be less than the totals for both sides if the war continued with an invasion of the homeland islands (estimated to take at least another full year). The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki brought the war to an immediate end and saved the lives of over a million Japanese and Allied soldiers.
The use of nuclear weapons may have caused the civilian physicists who designed the weapons to stigmatize their use as "War Crimes". The "laws governing war" did not envision such power and their use was widely viewed with revulsion.
Regards,
GtG
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
