Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman; thackney

Couldn’t they use salt water?....................


11 posted on 06/17/2015 8:19:26 AM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

No way, that would lower the ocean level.


12 posted on 06/17/2015 8:21:17 AM PDT by MaxMax (Call the local GOP and ask how you can support CRUZ for POTUS,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
I don't see why not. Current fracking water here in Pennsylvania is sent to a facility to be reprocessed for removal of contaminants. Salt is, by far, the major contaminant.

Of course, we're talking California here. Using seawater would involve building some type of pipeline or hose and that might disturb the habitat of some newly discovered sub-species of dung beetle or something . . .

13 posted on 06/17/2015 8:25:50 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Ocean water is packed with biologicals that would plug the hole in the pores the oil needs to flow through. Even single algae and the like could grow and destroy the formation from production. It would be quite expensive to clean up enough to use.

Also,I have been reading for at least a year how poorly the Monterey responds to hydro frac due to the multitude of existing twisted fractures. They have had better results with acid treatment and some other completion methods.


50 posted on 06/17/2015 5:13:14 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson