To: rktman; thackney
Couldn’t they use salt water?....................
11 posted on
06/17/2015 8:19:26 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
To: Red Badger
No way, that would lower the ocean level.
12 posted on
06/17/2015 8:21:17 AM PDT by
MaxMax
(Call the local GOP and ask how you can support CRUZ for POTUS,)
To: Red Badger
I don't see why not. Current fracking water here in Pennsylvania is sent to a facility to be reprocessed for removal of contaminants. Salt is, by far, the major contaminant.
Of course, we're talking California here. Using seawater would involve building some type of pipeline or hose and that might disturb the habitat of some newly discovered sub-species of dung beetle or something . . .
13 posted on
06/17/2015 8:25:50 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Red Badger
Ocean water is packed with biologicals that would plug the hole in the pores the oil needs to flow through. Even single algae and the like could grow and destroy the formation from production. It would be quite expensive to clean up enough to use.
Also,I have been reading for at least a year how poorly the Monterey responds to hydro frac due to the multitude of existing twisted fractures. They have had better results with acid treatment and some other completion methods.
50 posted on
06/17/2015 5:13:14 PM PDT by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson