Posted on 06/15/2015 2:20:17 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
This was in 2002, before the “transition.”
According to a Court of Appeals opinion, Dolezal’s lawsuit “claimed discrimination based on race, pregnancy, family responsibilities and gender.” She alleged that Smith and other school officials improperly blocked her appointment to a teaching assistant post, rejected her application for a post-graduate instructorship, and denied her scholarship aid while she was a student.
The court opinion also noted that Dolezal claimed that the university’s decision to remove some of her artworks from a February 2001 student exhibition was “motivated by a discriminatory purpose to favor African-American students over” her.
As detailed in the court opinion, Dolezal’s lawsuit contended that Howard was “permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult.”
She lost the suit but Dolezal’s issues with Howard were well known to her family. Her history with the school is fascinating, in fact, and may be a window onto why she began to try to pass as black in the first place. She got a full scholarship to Howard for her art, which specialized in portraits of African-Americans. The school, her father claims, “took her for a black woman” because of her subject matter although she presented herself as white at the time and wouldn’t begin to change her appearance until years later.
Turns out things weren’t always easy for a white student on campus:
[Rachel’s brother] Ezra believes the only reason his sister would change her identity was due to the racism she claimed to have encountered at Howard University, where she graduated with her master’s degree in fine art in 2002.
Rachel, he added, would often complain that she was treated poorly as one of only a few white students on a mostly black campus.
“She used to tell us that teachers treated her differently than other people and a lot of them acted like they didn’t want her there,” Ezra said. “Because of her work in African-American art, they thought she was a black student during her application, but they ended up with a white person.”
He said that the experience made her angry, and it was then that Rachel started being “hateful to white people.”
She ended up “self-hating,” he claims, which, if true, helps explain the psychological pressure to “become” black. A bit more detail courtesy of a former Howard student:
While nobody doubted [Dolezal’s] racial identity [at Howard], the former student told BuzzFeed News that some faculty members were critical of the motivations behind her work. She noted one professor specifically: Tritobia Benjamin, who was well known in the art world as an authority on black female artists.
“Dr. Benjamin was very critical of Rachel,” the former student told BuzzFeed News, because although she was white, she “captured the black body in her paintings,” particularly black men.
So imagine you’re Rachel Dolezal, having grown up with adopted brothers and sisters who are black, having married a black man, having focused your art on African-American subjects, having applied and been accepted to Howard University, and then discovering that you’re still not black enough to be fully accepted in the cultural and academic circles you move in. Part of the reason she changed her appearance doubtless was sincere identification with and admiration for black culture, but partly too it now seems like an act of desperation to assimilate as completely as she wished. She was caught in an authenticity trap, a ludicrous phony when she tried to pass as black and a “problematic” white artist exploiting black subjects when she didn’t.
Via Mediaite, here’s Whoopi Goldberg wondering why, if a man can sincerely feel like he’s a woman, Rachel Dolezal can’t sincerely feel like she’s black, a question conservatives have been asking for the past four days. Note too Whoopi’s joke near the end about how she’s fine with Dolezal’s new identity so long as she’s prepared for “everything that comes with that.” I asked that question this morning. What if Dolezal is prepared for it? What if she prefers to live as a black woman even if that means experiencing prejudice? If race is a social construct and the touchstone of that construct in America is oppression, why shouldn’t a white woman who’s willing to endure it because of her appearance, with no intention of changing that appearance, be treated as authentic?
And when they said “no”, she turned black and sued them for discrimination and won.
That’s called “white privilege”. :)
Is this boomeranging on the left or what.
It’s delish!
Are we actually seeing “Black Privilege”?
Thanks for posting this.
She did like blacks getting scholarships she felt were hers. So she stole fro them.
The left are backed into a logical corner and they know it. If you can have your genitalia mutilated and take injections to swing your secondary sexual characteristics the other way, then that makes you the other way by their standards. Now we have another person who say takes melanin injections or gets a nice tan, frizzes their hair, and listens to hip-hop, then arent they, by the left’s own yardstick, black? You betcha as Sarah says. And if they want to press the issue, then they’ll need race-police, proving that they are the nazis they accuse everyone else of being.
RD has become, unintentionally, an advocate for anti affirmative action. She has proven beyond a shadow of doubt how much of a scam it is. I think it deserves a very public and loud LOLLOLLOLLOLLOLLOLLOLLOL!!!!!!!
but does she have badunka-dunk?
And then she gets outed by her honkie parents no wonder she is pissed. Guess Mom and Pops won’t be getting a invite to the Kwanza celebration this year!
My guess there are 100’s maybe more Rachels out there.....
Amerika has become the freak show the left wants - $100 trillion debt, open borders, communist public schools, massive federal regulation, dumbed down electorate, opaque citizenship, with no relief in sight.
We are Argentina circa 1900.
She is like a one man wrecking ball, to the race game.
This is a little like watching the ball in a pin ball machine, crashing from one ringer to the next.
Further and further down the rabbit-hole we go. I can’t think of a better indictment of the left’s “social (dis)engineering”. This ethically (and perhaps ethnically) bankrupt person played both sides of the street to game the system. Everything she does, everything she is is a lie.
The left knows it but can’t admit to if because that would be an admission of the failure of leftist civil rights.
If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em.
Wait...The article says to became a black woman to STOP the prejudice she was receiving!
White is the new Black.
Delicious is too mild a word. This chick is like a grenade that rolled into the left’s tent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.