Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Developers can be required to include affordable housing, California high court rules
Los Angeles Times ^ | June 15, 2015 | Maura Dolan, reporting from San Francisco

Posted on 06/15/2015 11:16:52 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

The California Supreme Court decided unanimously Monday that cities and counties may require developers to provide below-market-rate housing as a condition of a building permit......

Monday's decision stemmed from a constitutional challenge of an affordable housing ordinance passed in San Jose five years ago.....

The law requires developers building 20 or more housing units to offer 15% at below-market rates or pay into a city fund.

.........“The community as a whole should bear the burden of furthering this interest, not merely some segment of the community.”

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: 5thamandment; ca; cabrinigreen; fairhousingact; housing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 06/15/2015 11:16:52 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

California deserves to go broke.


2 posted on 06/15/2015 11:17:35 AM PDT by MeganC (You can ignore reality, but reality won't ignore you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

...or pay into a city fund.


3 posted on 06/15/2015 11:17:42 AM PDT by newfreep ("Evil succeeds when good men do nothting" - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Socialism, now mandated by law...


4 posted on 06/15/2015 11:18:19 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

California remains nucking futz.


5 posted on 06/15/2015 11:18:41 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The new GOP slogan: "Vote for us!!! We're 15% less evil than the Democrats!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

“or pay into a city fund.”

Back in the old days we used to call that EXTORTION.


6 posted on 06/15/2015 11:19:27 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The more I see the way the American Liberal Welfare State works, the more I realize that Communists had it all wrong. Allow the rich and productive to work and, technically, earn more than the poor and middle class, just take everything from them and force them to do government’s bidding on their own dime. Keep the scheme going until the last productive person collapses under the weight of the burden.


7 posted on 06/15/2015 11:19:46 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
The California Supreme Court never heard of this:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

8 posted on 06/15/2015 11:20:36 AM PDT by MeganC (You can ignore reality, but reality won't ignore you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The article says that 15% of the units must be offered at a lower than market rate (or a compensating payment to the city must be made). What it doesn’t say is how much lower than market rate—20% is significant, 50% is humongous, anything more is a nearly complete giveaway.


9 posted on 06/15/2015 11:21:57 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Easy enough...build 19 housing units or do the smart thing and get out of California.


10 posted on 06/15/2015 11:22:20 AM PDT by Plumres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The law requires developers building 20 or more housing units to offer 15% at below-market rates or pay into a city fund.

So then build in multiples of 19..............

11 posted on 06/15/2015 11:22:25 AM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I wonder about these justices opinions about providing free legal assistance as a condition of their elevation to the Supreme bench.


12 posted on 06/15/2015 11:22:56 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The developers will have to put this cost into the price of their other units...middle class gets hit again. Limo-libs still untouched.


13 posted on 06/15/2015 11:23:21 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The law requires developers building 20 or more housing units to offer 15% at below-market rates or pay into a city fund.

OK, split the land into multiple 15-unit parcels, sell each to different corporate entities, and develop 15 units at a time.

14 posted on 06/15/2015 11:23:35 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/apr/15/local/me-housing-density15


15 posted on 06/15/2015 11:24:48 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Hey, wasn’t that phrase written by old white, slave-owning men? That means it doesn’t really have any weight in today’s society.


16 posted on 06/15/2015 11:25:27 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Public sector unions: A & B agreeing on a contract to screw C!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Servant quarters.


17 posted on 06/15/2015 11:27:53 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Falcon 105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
So then build in multiples of 19..............

Then they'll call that structuring.

-PJ

18 posted on 06/15/2015 11:30:42 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

every mansion in Hollyweird is required to take in a few ghetto families...


19 posted on 06/15/2015 11:31:26 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

“California deserves to go broke.”

Those of us conservatives who live here keep hoping it will because there is no way back to stability without California going under.


20 posted on 06/15/2015 11:35:47 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson