Posted on 06/12/2015 12:57:46 PM PDT by Kaslin
Do the name callers who label people Islamaphobic support Quran-instructed violence against women and girls?
To be anti-Islam (and anti-Sharia) is to reject submission to Allah and the Quran. To be anti-Islam is to be for protecting womens rights and human rights. To be anti-Islam is to advocate for children who are powerless and voiceless, to liberate everyone enslaved by Islamic totalitarian ideology.
There is nothing bigoted, racist, or fearful about opposing a political ideology that rejects universally accepted human rights laws.
If the European Court on Human Rights has repeatedly ruled that Sharia law is incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy, then why defend it?
What alternatives are name callers suggesting that Islamaphobes should consider? None. Defenders of Islam (and Sharia law) are anti-women and anti-girls. They endorse:
Those who oppose Islam support policies and laws that protect women and children from violence — exposing the evils of child marriage, slavery, female genital mutilation, honor killings, and institutionalized prostitution and sex trafficking. The least safe countries for women are Muslim majority countries (2012 World Economic Forum report).
Those who oppose Islam seek to aid and protect refugees who have survived genocide and slave bazaars (Open Doors reports 2014 was the worst year in the modern era for persecution of Christians).
Being anti-Islam equates to supporting democratic freedoms — including free speech — not hate speech — and demanding that government officials who have taken oaths to defend the U.S. Constitution actually protect citizens from Sharia law.
Naming and fighting evil is rooted in love — love that seeks to safeguard the innocent and offer an alternative to those influenced by evil. Out of love, people name and fight evil, which seeks to destroy what is good, in order to safeguard and promote that which is life-giving.
As Margaret Thatcher once articulated, those who are anti-Islam are for: … a society where people are free to make choices, to make mistakes, to be generous and compassionate. This is what we mean by a moral society...
Mislabeling supporters of freedom and human rights advocates as hatemongers, fear mongers, bigots, ignorant, or phobic of some kind only expresses irrational hatred without offering an alternative to their diatribe. Worse still, name callers enable, permit—and even ensure—that hate crimes will increasingly occur and victims voices, especially girls, will continue to be silenced.
mohamed was a child rapist.
and therefor a criminal
Great point!
Leftist name callers are mentally ill.
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.