Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The author makes good points on the differences between tolerating sin nad celebrating or promoting sin (scandal). Also LGBT activists do not simply want liberty to do what they want to do (Christians are willing to be tolerant). Instead, they want equality, that is to force people to recognize their sin as being normative (equal to heterosexual marriage) and thus something to be celebrated, like a heterosexual marriage. That is something that a believing Christian cannot do, in regard to ANY sin. Make no mistake. LGBT activists (including many Obama appointees) want to see Christianity and Christian teachings destroyed.
1 posted on 06/10/2015 8:19:12 PM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DeweyCA

You can celebrate gays or you can protect children. You can’t do both.


2 posted on 06/10/2015 8:22:40 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

There is a Part II and III to “no”?


3 posted on 06/10/2015 8:25:34 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

Can wolves and sheep exist in the same barn?

I don’t understand why some of the most obvious things are so lost on so many people. Well Actually I do. People do not want to face any truth that would get them disinvited from their social circle. Hint: If your social circle is gay supportive, you have a deeper problem.


4 posted on 06/10/2015 8:26:02 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

If you will notice the progression of public profession by homosexuals, when they first started to openly agitate for civil rights, the only claimed the right to be left alone. This is a clear statement that was made to the media in the wake of the Stonewall riot. More than one source states this was the beginning of the “LGBT movement”.

Move forward to today, where homosexuals aggressively practice a form of “lawfare” against small enterprises that provide services to weddings, such as those specializing in wedding cakes. We have seen the development of a collusion with their allies in government to yield a form of fascism that is more like the Pink Swastika. Bake the Cake or forfeit your business and your life’s savings.

Homosexuals have always craved approval. They vainly attempt to create it out of thin air by having “pride”, but they cannot get approval from people who reject their sexual immorality.

So the answer to the question posed by this thread, is no and hell no. Every person who is willing to point out the spiritual truth that opposes their behavior is a mortal enemy to them and must be destroyed in a way that (like Islam) intimidates those who remain into silence.

Like the Apostle Paul warned, a person who knows and loves the spiritual truth about this sin brings the smell of eternal death far too close to such people.


6 posted on 06/10/2015 8:37:34 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

Thanks for posting!

One of the best written series of articles on the gay marriage issue ever. Should be required reading for both sides.

Looking forward to part 5!


10 posted on 06/10/2015 9:02:06 PM PDT by SweetAkitoRose (lurking since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

Bad headline. Being gay and acting gay are two totally different things.


12 posted on 06/10/2015 9:33:52 PM PDT by bramps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

The left wants to shut down any and all opposition to their plans and ideas. They do not know what those might be tomorrow or the next day but anyone who does not support it to the hilt is their new enemy.


13 posted on 06/11/2015 1:49:08 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

I cut ties with a group of friends last night after a conversation about gay marriage. In their desperate attempt to validate the belief that gay marriage was virtuous (because it’s about love, man!), they took a stand on completely morally relativistic ground. Specifically, they refused to condemn gay incestuous sex, whether it be father/brother or brother/brother, because... you know... whatever floats the boat of two consenting adults.

I sat there listening to FIVE people openly defend incest because they knew that if they agreed to my point about a moral decision there, I might paint them into a corner on gay marriage in general. That’s when I knew that they had all crossed the line. They had gone from ignorance of sin to celebration of it. They had gone to Sodom and Gomorrah where the mob found it perfectly acceptable to rape the two angels, if only Lot would turn them over. That’s just how *it is*, man.

Sooooo... that was that. I told them that my daughter had been asking to spend more time with me and - given any call to hang out with them - I would instead use that as an opportunity to spend time with her.

Sadly, it is difficult to find friends these days who DON’T celebrate sin.


14 posted on 06/11/2015 3:08:16 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

First STOP using the word “gay”, theses people are not happy. They are homosexuals.
Second, of course homosexuals cab co-exist in a nor,Al world, if they STFU!


18 posted on 06/14/2015 9:32:20 PM PDT by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson