And here’s where the debate gets nasty. Because talking about sex as a reproductive system offends the sensibilities if liberals. To them, sex is only about the physical feelings and gratification. And to that end, they feel that sex outside marriage is OK with any number of partners, any gender of partners.
I’ve taken to calling Gay activists science deniers...they love to tout science while scoffing at the religious arguments....that is until the science that absolutely invalidates the health of the homosexual lifestyle is brought up! So bring up the science suggesting that they are science deniers, they’ll get snooty and stalk off.
Boy, you put your finger on it. And in such a simple (but profound!) way. They truly hate that sex is related to procreation, don’t they?
I wouldn’t have met with them if I were them. I understand why they did, but it is futile. There is no ground to give. There is no negotiation to be had. The two ideologies are incompatible.
Most conservatives have fully fallen for the idea that they can choose de-natured variations on sex (that is, deliberately deprived of its inherently fertile nature).
The unnatural gay acts and the de-natured "straight" acts are similarly abusing the sexual function by splitting it off from its procreative design.