Crayfish, Caribou, and Scientific Evidence in the Wild

Institute for Creation Research ^ | June 2015 | James J. S. Johnson, J.D., Th.D.

[TexasGator]

Down heah in looisianer we call them:

1. Cambarellus puer CS
2. Cambarellus shufeldtii CS
3. Cambarus diogenes ¤ CS
4. Cambarus ludovicianus CS
5. Fallicambarus dissitus CS
6. Fallicambarus hedgpethi CS
7. Fallicambarus macneesei SC
8. Fallicambarus oryktes SC
9. Faxonella beyeri CS
10. Faxonella clypeata CS
11. Faxonella creaseri SC
12. Orconectes blacki T
13. Orconectes difficilis CS
14. Orconectes hathawayi SC
15. Orconectes hobbsi CS
16. Orconectes lancifer CS
17. Orconectes maletae T
18. Orconectes palmeri creolanus CS
19. Orconectes palmeri longimanus CS
20. Orconectes palmeri palmeri CS
21. Orconectes texanus CS
22. Procambarus acutus acutus ¤ CS
23. Procambarus bivittatus CS
24. Procambarus clarkii CS
25. Procambarus dupratzi CS
26. Procambarus elegans CS
27. Procambarus geminus CS
28. Procambarus hinei CS
29. Procambarus jaculus CS
30. Procambarus natchitochae CS
31. Procambarus penni SC
32. Procambarus planirostris CS
33. Procambarus shermani CS
34. Procambarus simulans CS
35. Procambarus tulanei CS
36. Procambarus viaeviridis CS
37. Procambarus vioscai CS
38. Procambarus zonangulus CS

[TexasGator]

“The pro-evolution posters rarely back up their claims with any substance. When they do attempt to defend evolution their posts and links are often riddled with non-scientific words [like maybe, could, should, expect to, probably, possibly, etc].”

God did it! Happy now?

[fishtank]

Hey, I know that, I’m from Texas.... but I had to use the title from the article.

[BrandtMichaels]

Sure I do. Your example is micro-evolution aka natural adaptation. Scientifically proven, but not by Darwin.

Darwin conjectured much, proved nothing for macro-evolution and even stated his theory completely falls apart if the fossil record does not find thousands upon thousands of transitional fossils.

BTW transitional fossils are those one would need to prove macro-evolution.

Neener, neener!!!

[BrandtMichaels]

I understand those mountains upon mountains of evidence to be flimsy and fraudulent science where the data in no way supports the conclusions.

Global warming also has mountainous volumes of scientific papers. Volumes and volumes of paperwork do not automatically prove the claims.

Obviously ymmv, my bias is against evolution [not for]. And yes, I’ve studied enough to draw a these obvious conclusions. Mutations are not improvements in the DNA code and will eventually lead to extinction.

If you deny God you can allow yourself to be deluded about most anything.

[muir_redwoods]

So,you didnt study up.