Easy. Send a bearded dirty brown skinned CIA agent to the smallest mosques in town. You’ll find out real quick who is behind it.
If they REFUSE to even connect the words ISLAM or MUSLIM with ‘terrorism’ while our Administration and State Department collude to import even more Muslims to this country, how can such NOT become a trend?
It is a hotbed of liberalism, sooooo duh....
That's a tough question to liberals. Is a disarmed city full of metrosexuals who won't even fight to defend themselves or their children more vulnerable? Is a region that has rejected God and traditional values, while embracing every perversion imagined, a more tempting target than other parts of the country?
I don't know. Let's ask the 9-11 bombers who chose flights starting in Boston's Logan Airport. Let's ask the Tsarnaev brothers, who chose Boston as their target. Let's ask Obama who carried Boston in 2012 with 80% of the vote. Sensible people would notice a pattern that America's enemies choose Boston, and Boston chooses America's enemies. Liberals are perplexed.
There is a network of communication (whether it is conspiratorial in planning or just Islamonazi in ideology I don’t know) in the Boston area.
When I looked up one of the Imam leading protests last week, I discovered this (new to me, knowledge was out there and compiled by others):
FYI on “Imam Abdullah Faaruuq”
https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/letters/2013/05/04/problem-not-with-boston-muslims-but-with-radical-leaders/LqExH1l9B9FvleIWhEdcxH/story.html
Problem is not with Boston Muslims but with radical leaders
May 05, 2013
Lisa Wangsness and meghan e. Irons cite only me as a critic of the Islamic Society of Boston, whose Cambridge mosque was attended by at least one of the suspected Boston Marathon bombers (“Praying for peace — and understanding,” Page A1, April 27). In fact there have been others who have recognized the radical nature of the mosque leadership. The situation today is far different from the time Mayor Menino agreed to subsidize the building of the Islamic Society of Boston’s Saudi-funded mosque, and when many in the Jewish community embraced the mosque’s leaders...
...A few months ago, Northeastern University dismissed Imam Abdullah Faaruuq, a frequent spokesperson for the Islamic Society of Boston, from his role as Muslim student chaplain after we released a video of Faaruuq urging Muslim students at Northeastern to support terror suspect Tarek Mehanna, and telling a gathering at a mosque that “it’s time to pick up the gun and the sword and go out and do your job.”
...Charles Jacobs
President
Americans for Peace and Tolerance
Boston
The Counter Jihad Report
http://counterjihadreport.com/tag/abdullah-faaruuq/
Video Exposes Northeastern University’s Muslim Chaplain as an Islamist Extremist
Posted on September 7, 2012
By CHARLES JACOBS:
“Our video shows that there is a culture of extremism at the Islamic Society of Northeastern University (ISNU) – the Muslim student group on campus under the leadership of its spiritual advisor, Imam Faaruuq,” said human rights activist Dr. Charles Jacobs, APT President...
Islamic Extremism @ Northeastern University
https://youtu.be/50YgDPSheVk
Published on Sep 5, 2012
Add to that all of the BinLaden relatives who were assisted in getting out of the US after 911.
It's the nutty Boston agenda centering around the universities. They seem to relish the very weird problems brought in along with the globalist agenda they promote. Nobody ever said after 911 or the Tsarnov maniacs "send home people who don't belong and/or don't need to be in the US". While all that goes on, the elite live in places very sheltered from the chaos their agenda initiates.
Funny now that the Boston media is just now questioning if it's the new normal. It's been "normal" in Boston for quite some time.
allow muslim scum into the usa and what do you expect....
wake up
Time to implement the Norway protocols.
9/11 hijackers boarded planes in Boston. Yes, the liberal place breeds terrorists.
(1) that foreign nationals must at least avoid crime,
(2) stay off public assistance,
(3) that the US is disinclined to grant "asylum" (triggers endless SS checks) to “fearful refugees” from war-torn Islamic regions,
(4) that force taxpayers to foot the bill for these types to go back and forth between America and their supposedly "hostile Muslim homelands" on the taxpayers' dime.