Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stakes Are High as Supreme Court Nears Obamacare Decision
St. Louis Today ^ | June 7, 2015 | Jordan Shapiro

Posted on 06/07/2015 3:58:35 PM PDT by SteveH

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: wastoute

Please enough with this crap.


21 posted on 06/07/2015 5:56:10 PM PDT by Perdogg (I'm on a no Carb diet- NO Christie Ayotte Romney or Bush - stay outta da Bushesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

There are no stakes. Obama wins either way. A bigger win for Obamacare is if subsidies are gone and the Republicans bail out the subsidies, as announced.


22 posted on 06/07/2015 5:56:31 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

You have a better explanation for what happened last time?


23 posted on 06/07/2015 6:05:09 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

Balderdash. Both wings of the uniparty agree on deathcare, and its not going anywhere. Even if by some miracle the courts invalidate portions of ithe subsidies, you can rest assured that the gop and rats will be rushing to replace them.

I do hope the courts toss the subsidies. Not because I have some naive hope that it will end deathcare, but because it will be immensely entertaining to see the gop faction twisting itself intto a pretzel to figure out a way to keep the subsidies and preserve deathcare in spite of their lofty rhetoric to the contrary.


24 posted on 06/07/2015 6:18:07 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat ( The ballot is a suggestion box for slaves and fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

Don’t we all know by now that the SC is too chickenshit to overturn Obiecare no matter what is or isn’t constitutional?


25 posted on 06/07/2015 6:35:42 PM PDT by Bullish (Not even a smidgeon of integrity or sanity in this whitehouse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
"There’s a world of difference between a “health care expert” and an actual doctor."

Yeah, like that Gruber dude!!!

26 posted on 06/07/2015 7:03:17 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Help Stamp Out Pernicious Progressives and Arrogant Activists With Their Liberalism!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

“Roberts will get a visit from a couple of guys in dark suits that will have a Manila folder...”

Perhaps the Hastert indictment for improperly withdrawing money from his bank accounts, and subsequent government leaks of alleged sexual misconduct, is a clear message.


27 posted on 06/07/2015 7:04:38 PM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Everybody should read post #17 from this thread:

Agree that post outlines one possibility and frankly the outcomes that post outlines should send a shudder down every right-thinking American's spine.

There are also other alternatives such as posted here.

I think the most likely scenario is that the USSC is going to uphold Obamacare as-is (and why not? They re-wrote the law in the first place!) which will then force the Republican's to take one of the actions I outlined in my post #49 in that thread.

We're all going to find out one way or another soon enough.

28 posted on 06/07/2015 7:13:16 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: impactplayer

Obama is doing this to have them change their mind.

He did it with Obamacare’s first ruling. That had already been decided and Roberts’ blackmail worked, and he switched and rewrote the outcome.


29 posted on 06/07/2015 7:44:19 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; wastoute

He’s right,

there’s no need for them to visit him again. Roberts knows that stuff didn’t just disappear from the first time.


30 posted on 06/07/2015 7:46:21 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

what is he being blackmailed over?


31 posted on 06/07/2015 7:49:10 PM PDT by Perdogg (I'm on a no Carb diet- NO Christie Ayotte Romney or Bush - stay outta da Bushesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
a health care expert

AKA, a political hack of the socialist persuasion.

32 posted on 06/07/2015 7:53:35 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

His adopted kids and his sexuality.


33 posted on 06/07/2015 7:53:54 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

This means the ramifications go well beyond a few subsidies.

It will shift the pretend balance of power - heading to a dictatorship.


34 posted on 06/07/2015 7:56:58 PM PDT by Hardens Hollow (Couldn't find Galt's Gulch, so created our own Harden's Hollow to quit paying the fascist beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

Decisions are announced mon and Thurs at 9:30.


35 posted on 06/07/2015 7:57:58 PM PDT by Hardens Hollow (Couldn't find Galt's Gulch, so created our own Harden's Hollow to quit paying the fascist beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Good post, #49, but depressing.


36 posted on 06/07/2015 8:01:33 PM PDT by Hardens Hollow (Couldn't find Galt's Gulch, so created our own Harden's Hollow to quit paying the fascist beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: All

My point is that if the Supremes do not draw a line in the sand against bad law, then there is effectively no restriction against more and sometimes even worse bad law from coming down the pike in their direction. Furthermore, this is not the end of the so-called challenges to Obamacare, such as Sissel v HHS.


37 posted on 06/07/2015 8:02:00 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

I believe that the administration’s fear is that if there is a ruling against the ACA, the uprising over it really want be that big. Thus proving that there numbers of the truly needy are inflated. The vast majority of people will just go on and get their insurance somewhere else.


38 posted on 06/07/2015 8:06:54 PM PDT by political1 (Love your neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

Once you let the genie out if the bottle...


39 posted on 06/07/2015 8:31:33 PM PDT by Crucial (Tolerance at the expense of equal treatment is the path to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Where have you been? This has been thrashed about for a long time right after the SC decision.The reply you received from another Freeper is right on the money.


40 posted on 06/07/2015 8:53:12 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson