Posted on 06/04/2015 4:08:41 AM PDT by markomalley
Two years past its deadline and $140 million over budget, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has only completed 1.5 percent of its goal to update its IT system.
The Modernize and Innovate the Delivery of Agricultural Systems (MIDAS) program was intended to act as a more efficient IT system that streamlines its aid programs for farmers. However, after spending nearly a half a billion dollars on the project, the USDA has only finished one out of 66 of the projects tasks.
In response to a longstanding need to modernize the delivery of farm programs, the United States Department of Agricultures (USDA) Farm Service Agency (FSA) initiated a business enterprise solution called Modernize and Innovate the Delivery of Agricultural Systems (MIDAS), according to an audit by the Office of Inspector General (OIG). FSA reported to Congress in 2010 that $305 million would allow it to consolidate its 31 farm programs into MIDAS by the end of fiscal year (FY) 2012.
MIDAS is 2 years overdue and approximately $140 million over budget and has not delivered the promised enterprise solution, the OIG said.
MIDAS was supposed to replace the Web Farm, a centralized computer server system that keeps track of information on farmers receiving aid from the USDAs 31 programs, because the system was antiquated and beginning to fail. The OIG found that only 1.5 percent of its applications had been switched over to MIDAS.
As of April 1, 2015, FSA had obligated over $444 million to this project and had retired only 1 of the 66 applications which were to be replaced by MIDAS, the audit said. By 2022, the program is projected to have a total cost of nearly $824 million.
Last July, the USDA was forced to stop the development of MIDAS after an order from Secretary Tom Vilsack.
Congress said the USDAs mismanagement of MIDAS is of greatest concern last year when drafting an appropriations bill for fiscal year 2015.
MIDAS was intended to deliver a modernized, secure, and integrated IT solution, they said. The planning for MIDAS began over 10 years ago, and after spending over $400 million, USDA ended the MIDAS project by redefining the scope of the project and failing to deliver what USDA had promised Congress and the agricultural community.
In response to the audit, the USDA said it would bring in an outside group to conduct an independent analysis to determine whether the current IT system meets the needs of the agency in a cost effective manner.
In conclusion, OIG believes the Department made the appropriate decision to halt development, modernization, and enhancement activities under the MIDAS project, the OIG said. Based upon our review, the future of MIDAS still needs to be determined.
At a projected annual operational and maintenance cost of over $50 million per year, FSA and the Department must determine whether the benefits derived from the solution warrant that level of resource commitment.
From a consultants standpoint - Score!
I’m not at all surprised. I’ve seen how the feds do IT.
The federal budget needs to be halved. As a start.
Here, apparently, is the perhaps deposed CIO:
http://www.ocio.usda.gov/leaders/cheryl-cook
If I didn’t know better, I’d swear that was the same woman as the deputy CIO on the other page.
Ah, here is the old CIO, “retiring” on March 10th to take the PA state equivalent job.
http://fedscoop.com/usda-cio-cheryl-cook-leaves-post
Laz's fault.
I wonder if CSC had their inept paws in this.
Information Technology (IT) is an area where the incompetent are promoted if they cannot be fired. The idea is the incompetents do less damage if they are removed from jobs where intelligence and ability are critical.
The downside is the incompetents eventually accumulate at the top because they can't be fired.
“The Modernize and Innovate the Delivery of Agricultural Systems (MIDAS) program >>>>>> was intended to act as a more efficient IT system that streamlines its aid programs for farmers.”
Midas was intended to FURTHER enrich the school friends of Moochelle just as the Obummer Care computer system/Programing was ??
Peter Principle thruout Obummer’s adminstration,,,Also they are all AAA rated...
A firmative
A ction
A nus’
Some truth to that. If one is an actual IT programmer, you can't fake out the compiler by bleating about a micro-agression. The computer is cold logic. It does not care who you are, your gender, your age, whatever. You either can or can't fix the problem.
Move on up the line, however, and especially in government, and it's all about the surface fluff, posturing, and political favors. It is amazing any government IT project ever succeeds.
But the Acting CIO has a certificate in Emotional Intelligence, so there's that.
Whatever the f *that* is. Jeez.
Give me a tenth of that and I’d get it done right in a tenth of the time.
Paid for with our grand children’s credit card.
Another example of Obama wasting the taxpayer’s money.
Does this mean what I think it means? To hand out cash to potential Democrat voters faster?
Ha—you’re the first one to point out that this department is failing in its attempts to automate what the government shouldn’t be doing at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.