Posted on 05/31/2015 4:47:12 PM PDT by grundle
Edited on 05/31/2015 6:02:58 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
It's only a scandal if the left-wing snooze media decides to cover it.
I saw the show and thought it was like Clinton's bought-and-paid-for "Three Noes" performance in China that time.
I decided that Brooksie has gotten crossways with someone nasty and vindictive like Valerie Jarrett, and this was his "makeup" crawling and handkissing, to get out of trouble.
I thought his performance false and, frankly, captive and coerced, as if he were an "air pirate" being paraded by the North Vietnamese, after being tortured. That's what he sounded like.
David Brooks is blind enough to be a MLB umpire.
Here are 1,080 well sourced examples of Obamas lying, lawbreaking, corruption, cronyism, hypocrisy, waste, etc.
https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2013/08/15/obama-252/
Yes, the White-out House
may he find his happiness there in his soon retirement.
You are exactly right. Brit Hume (Fox) once said there is no scandal unless the media makes an event/issue one. And, with this Obama loving sycophant media, there never will be one — not that there isn’t enough factual lying, corruption and abuse of power by Obama and his administration that would qualify.
sounds like 1984 Newspeak
He’s not gonna get much of a taste with the cap on.
that perplexed look on his face....is a sure sign that he doesnt even know how to un cap the bottle...
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...
He may be closer to the truth about the scandals than he realizes. Obama only had one scandal,but it must be a big one as it continues on.
This is the framework under which these a-holes operate:
1) Scandal after scandal emerges. The NYT refuses to report on any of it.
2) The Administration stonewalls, ignores Congress and the Courts, and refuses to investigate itself through the DOJ.
3) The NYT steadfastly refuses to note any of 2), above.
4) The NYT crows about what a scandal-free administration this is.
I suppose if you are going to be a laughable liar and co-conspirator, you should go all-in. For their commitment, I give them kudos.
——And I have my disagreements, say, with President Obama, but President Obama has run an amazingly scandal-free administration, not only he himself, but the people around him. Hes chosen people who have been pretty scandal-free.-——
If you parse Brocks exact words, he is correct...Obama and the people around him are scandal free....
Move to the outer ring of his circle, his stooges, his indirect reports... You could write a novel...
IRS, VA, BAFT, SS, State Dept..just to name a few...
Why do you think he read most of his scandals in the paper...
Plausible deniability....
"Does it count as hacking since I knew the password?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.