Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

No doubt the dictator-in-chief will "executive action" every infringement on gun rights he thinks he can get away with, legal or not.
1 posted on 05/30/2015 12:41:57 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: jazusamo

If only we had an American president


2 posted on 05/30/2015 12:45:16 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Of making many books there is no end, and much study wearies the body.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

My response - I will not comply. Your move.


3 posted on 05/30/2015 12:47:44 PM PDT by Noumenon (Resistance. Rinestoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Misdemeanor = loss your constitutional rights.


4 posted on 05/30/2015 12:48:43 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Over a hundred murders every weekend by sons of Obama and they focus on more pointless regs. Go after the murdering savages in the city — that’s where all the crime is. There are 6 Columbines and 4 Sandy Hooks EVERY WEEKEND in Chicago and Baltimore alone.


5 posted on 05/30/2015 12:49:03 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Hopefully the Supreme Court will overturn this on appeal, but it may require such an act to undo this blatantly unconsitutional move by America’s Lenin.

Those who don’t think it can be done should consult the Massachusetts Attorney General’s lawless actions.

Haters of the Second Amendment, frustrated by their failures to overturn the United States’Constitution, are now resorting simply to ignoring it.


6 posted on 05/30/2015 12:51:15 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Any idea what these ‘regulations’ look like?


7 posted on 05/30/2015 12:51:45 PM PDT by Lazamataz (America has less than a year left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
while keeping an irresponsible, law-breaking few from inflicting harm on a massive scale

yes, that's why we try our best to keep the clintons and other Dems out of power.

9 posted on 05/30/2015 12:54:27 PM PDT by corlorde (Oath Keeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

“Gun safety advocates”...”But the gun lobby”...

No bias here. Tiny groups entirely founded and funded by anti-gun billionaires are “advocates” for “safety”, not gun control, but a grassroots organization of 4 million is a “lobby”, representing not gun owners but guns.


10 posted on 05/30/2015 12:55:09 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Whelp...time to purchase mo ammo, mo weapons.

Obozo, ain’t he grand!


14 posted on 05/30/2015 1:00:16 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

15 posted on 05/30/2015 1:00:28 PM PDT by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I am of the opinion that:

Any person convicted of a violent felony should be prevented from owning a gun while serving their sentence or their probation with their rights automatically restored at the end of serving their sentence.

If the prosecution believes that the person is a habitual violent felon, and wishes to permanently remove a citizens right to own a fire arm, then they should bring a formal charge before a jury and be convicted according to the same rules as a capital murder case.


18 posted on 05/30/2015 1:02:05 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

If the left treated abortion (no constitutional MENTION or RIGHT) the way the treat guns (constitutionally protected RIGHT),

there’d be gun stores everywhere, they’d be held to lower standards, they’d allow 2a shirts in schools, we’d have gun clubs and ranges (again) in public schools, we’d train our kids at school in the use of guns and not tell the parents, we’d do everything possible to put guns in the hands of people, and we’d subsidize gun purchasers to the tune of at least a billion federal dollars a year.


20 posted on 05/30/2015 1:10:14 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

High-powered pistol?


22 posted on 05/30/2015 1:15:25 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Let’s examine compliance shall we ?

The Connecticut modern sporting rifle ban compliance was below 10%

NY unSAFE Act....compliance was nearly zero.

You can make your rules and nobody will comply.


24 posted on 05/30/2015 1:20:15 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Ya gots to love it when anything this quota boy enacts by decree gets taken to the supremes and they slap him down AGAIN.


26 posted on 05/30/2015 1:38:21 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ( Obammy is a lie, a mooselimb and pond scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
The main thrust of the anti-gun lefties has been to "close the gunshow loophole" to eliminate private off-the-book sales of firearms.

Once they got that seemingly innocuous law in place, they ratchet up the disqualifiers for buying and possessing guns. Remember when the Brady Law was first enacted? Handguns only. Then came long guns, and the background check supposedly only affected "felons, mental cases, and drug users".

Then Congress included "domestic violence or even the accusation of domestic violence".

Then Congress added "misdemeanors that could be felonies today".

They want to finish the net and then begin making a tighter and tighter net until nothing gets through.

Warn Congress to block this mess and let's get a set of elected officials who will repeal the Brady Law and GCA 68 once and for all.

28 posted on 05/30/2015 1:48:55 PM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

They say this is because of Sandy Hook.

Even these rules would not have kept the firearms out of that whack jobs hands. His freakin’ mother bought him the weapons.

How are you going to avoid that?

How about we go back to locking down crazy people. And not just let them roam around looking for people to kill.


29 posted on 05/30/2015 1:52:31 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

No doubt it would be a small step from being
mentally ill and not being allowed a gun, to
wanting a gun makes you mentally ill.

Have to lock you up for the good of society...


32 posted on 05/30/2015 2:11:24 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
The Justice Department’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) is looking to revive a rule proposed way back in 1998 that would block domestic abusers from owning guns.

As proposed, the regulation makes it illegal for some who has been convicted of a misdemeanor domestic violence offense to own a gun.

I thought the Lautenberg Amendment (1996) already did this?

34 posted on 05/30/2015 2:18:45 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Time is coming for this brain dead Marxist Muslim dictator to B removed, before he decides to call a state of emergency and cancels the 2016 election.


35 posted on 05/30/2015 2:25:23 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson