Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/28/2015 9:49:48 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: servo1969
Texas student sues after college bans gun rights sign

"Freedom of Speech" Bitches! Do you speak it?

2 posted on 05/28/2015 9:51:23 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Incredible. They literally banned free political speech, based on the message.


3 posted on 05/28/2015 9:54:18 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

I wonder if the school will be stupid enough to now go the route of saying her presence is threatening and suspend her pending one of those nonjudicial hearings where the student is not allowed to have an attorney or confront their accusers? Those types of proceedings also need to be confronted in court and stopped.


4 posted on 05/28/2015 9:58:21 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

It’s the Bill of Rights, doncha know. It’s bigoted.


5 posted on 05/28/2015 10:01:17 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE)... a worthwhile organization, IMHO.


6 posted on 05/28/2015 10:21:00 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

If they were carrying signs against gun rights, they’d be patted on the back. Sad times in Texas these days.


7 posted on 05/28/2015 10:33:19 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

A few comments from an old lawyer:

First Amendment protections are there to protect the “utterers” of speech we find offensive, not just the speech itself. Words do not have rights. People do.

There are certain restrictions on speech, (FIACT, Fraud, Violent overthrow of USG, etc) but none apply here.

The people’s rights were clearly violated here. They were harassed by police in an illegal police action, they were embarrassed in public, a reasonable person watching this could reasonably assume they were doing something illegal and therefore had to stop, etc.

The officers and those directing them to take the illegal action are all liable.

http://www.lc.org/index.cfm?pid=14097 It’s probably a “$20,000 to make it go away” case.


9 posted on 05/28/2015 10:43:29 AM PDT by Crystal Palace East (90% of MSM is lies, except the National Enquirer, of course :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Hmm. Was she standing in the pre-approved “free-speech zone?”


11 posted on 05/28/2015 10:49:17 AM PDT by YourAdHere (It's Hillary's turn (to testify))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson