Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the scotsman
you are correct -- I highly simplified it with "by converting them to Protestantism" -- actually that's wrong, I would say more abetted it. But imagine if Scotland had not become Protestant? Politically it would then remain much more distinct from England -- like the Irish did

The fact that the Scots were fellow Protestants helped the island country not fear a land war

16 posted on 05/22/2015 8:43:38 AM PDT by Cronos (ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

I’m glad you made that amendment, but even ‘abetted’ is a bit strong. The Calvinism established in Scotland by John Knox c. 1560 was to all intents and purposes entirely independent of, and theologically quite distinct from the English Reformation happening at roughly the same time. There was never any serious attempt subsequently to merge the Church of Scotland (and its subsequent schismatic offshoots) with the Church of England, despite the Union of so many other aspects of the two nations. Anglicanism and Scottish Presbyterianism have always kept a distance from each other.


18 posted on 05/22/2015 10:17:18 AM PDT by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

I don’t agree, Scotland from the 15th/early 16th C was moving more and more towards a Union with England.

https://patrioticunionist.wordpress.com/2015/05/18/the-scottish-roots-of-unionism/


20 posted on 05/22/2015 10:20:16 AM PDT by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson