Posted on 05/16/2015 9:07:19 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
....and in twenty years these same ‘thoughtful’ liberals will be the same ones demonstrating for this little scum-bags release ‘because he has now demonstrated in his writings and interviews that he no longer believes in terrorism’
Then liberal teachers will have their classes write get well letters to their long suffering political prisoner.
“It was Armed and Dangerous, is that the one you were thinking of?”
Yeah, and I really liked Meg Ryan as the handgun instructor. “This is where the bullets come out!” pointing to the muzzle.
What a load of BS. I haven't personally talked to anyone up here who opposes it. I guess I just don't hang around with the right people.
Seems like I was taught that they were burnt at the stake, but I see now that is incorrect.
I agree, but without the love.
Some on a news program yesterday said That the Boston Bomber would be sent to a Super Max facility South of Terra Haute Indiana
All but one were hanged. One was executed by stoning.
Tom Keen is an evil murderer in the television show “The Black List”
Kind of like a football coach saying, gentlemen, this is a football.
McVeigh’s execution was relatively swift because McVeigh didn’t engage in endless appeals; this Boston terrorist in contrast, will make endless appeals.
The poor MSM is on suicide watch.
The People are glad the perp is going to die,
although most want him eaten by pig today.
The question I have is Was this a federal court?
And if so, do the feds even have jurisdiction?
Since I know something about basic economics and the...glorious history of Communism/Socialism, I am a real black sheep in our Communist of Massachusetts.
Liberal Chick gets college students to sign pressure cooker ban
Yep.
And if so, do the feds even have jurisdiction?
Would you prefer Taxachusetts had jurisdiction? Because, then, the Joker wouldn't be slated to die, Massachusetts not having the death penalty.
Instead, he might marry one to four of his groupies ... e.g.,
I kinda figured that Massachusetts doesn’t have the death penalty.
Which leads us to a question: Why, if the murders happened in Massachusetts, do the feds have jurisdiction?
And I AM NOT asking because I don’t think he deserves it, but I am asking because of the powers that exist, the Tenth amendment.
Could be fed jurisdiction because of terrorism or with “use of a weapon of mass destruction”.
In 1997 the MA Legislatur almost approved the DP, but state rep. John Slattery (”Slattery will get you nowhere”, I always say) changed his vote and it went down. (Thought there was a non binding referendum question about it shortly before which did pass...)
http://www.nodp.org/ma/stacks/globe_110797.html
>>(Nov 1997) Nine days after voting 81-79 in favor of capital punishment, the chamber deadlocked after one representative, John P. Slattery of Peabody, switched
his vote out of concern that innocent people could face execution, and that the bill did not afford enough protection for juveniles and minorities.
>>Under parliamentary rules, the 80-80 vote killed the bill, which would have allowed capital punishment for 15 categories of first-degree murder. The vote preserved Massachusetts’ status as one of 12 states without the
death penalty.
Wiki (Marathon Bombings): “On April 18 at about 10:48 pm, Sean A. Collier, 27, an MIT police officer...was ambushed in his police car and died from multiple gunshot wounds from the bombing suspects.”
The Wiki entry for Dzohkar says both brothers shot Collier
>>Tsarnaev and his brother murdered MIT police officer Sean Collier on April 18 at the MIT campus
They shouldn't. But they do. Unfortunately for the Joker.
And I AM NOT asking because I don’t think he deserves it, but I am asking because of the powers that exist, the Tenth amendment.
Maybe he could do something useful by appealing successfully, thereby saving his miserable Mooselimb life and preserving the Tenth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.