Posted on 05/15/2015 9:19:22 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
Coolidge witnessed the progressives of the early 1900s.
Coolidge was one of our greatest presidents. In the top five, in my opinion.
"... In other words, create a problem that is real bad and people will readily surrender their freedoms to settle for an answer that is half as bad."
we are seeing this done today.
How sad that in less than a hundred years; Coolidge’s fears of a totalitarian government ruling by force have come true here in America.
Agreed.
Their strategy and tactics haven’t changed.
Except that they always get more sophisticated about it.
This was near the beginning of the Marxist (Progressive) movement in the USA. Their game plan at that time was slightly different and much more oriented toward violent revolutionary tactics. When the Depression came they thought they had a ready market of poor, downtrodden Americans that would flock to their Communist party. When that failed due to Americans devotion to their country the Marxists switched to their long range plan of infiltrating the schools, government offices and social services. As we now can see, they have been eminently successful. They are political dry rot.
Ping, by Golly.
Dialecticism. For every "X" there is a "Not X." If you can identify the opposing sides, drive them farther and farther apart until there is no reconciling them any longer, the result will be a violent combining of the two extremes which obliterates both of them and gives rise to something new.
In Hegelian terms, Thesis gives rise to Antithesis, and when the two meet, Synthesis results.
Dialecticism is part of all historical dynamics. It can arise naturally as societies evolve, or it can be created, coerced, or imposed artificially.
In their rush to redefine the world after their own image, today's socialists are forcing dialectical splits wherever they see "fault lines:" race, age, sexual orientation, fiscal responsibility, sex ... You name it.
And it's working. The sides are being forced farther and farther apart until they have little in common any longer. Have you tried talking to a liberal recently? You might as well be talking calculus with a snapping turtle.
Absolutely.
Yep.
Same here.
Must read, for later.........
1933..........................
Excellent article. Thanks for posting this. Much needed for many to read this, IMO.
On steroids!
My favorite 20th century President.
Thanks for the post.
How does this relate to Hillary?
When she was being labeled a Liberal,Hillary replied,she was not a liberal,she is an early PROGRESSIVE,CASE CLOSED.
You can look it up
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.