The facts keep getting in the way.
More and more people are becoming "skeptical" of these fanatic chicken littles. Truth about decades of falsified data and inaccurate models is throwing ice on their warming scare.
So lets call the current administration “freedom deniers”
I’m a denier of the religion of Global Warming and proud of it.
Call them warmists.
When they inquire what that is, the response is total religious devotion to the concept of global warming. Leave it at that and walk away.
Thanks for posting. Tactics of totalitarians ALERT! (climate skeptic…climate denier…climate terrorist)
I think we should start a petition asking the media to start referring to Climate change activists as Climate Change Hoaxsters.
Hurray! I’m now a Racist AND a Denier! Wa-Hoo!
What’s the next pigeon-hole they’ll stick me in? *SNORT*
I usually just refer to these folks as “those in favor of global warming.”
They could ask we be called smelly lecherous kulaks, and the media would gladly comply.
There’s a yawning difference between denial of climate change and that of AGW. Anyone with an operating brain cell knows natural climate change is continually at work; the scam begins with the idea humans are the cause of it.
Is Soros Connected to New Global Warming Website Targeting Meteorologists?
Jan. 25, 2012
Michael Lewis and Anthony Watts write on the Watt’s Up With That? (WUWT) blog that Forecast the Facts partner, Citizen’s Engagement Laboratory — a “non-profit, non-partisan organization that uses digital media and technology to amplify the voices of underrepresented constituencies” — has received funding from George Soros in the past.
Receiving a tip from a reader identified as Jan, Watts — a former meteorologist with 25 years of on air experience who runs the blog as commentary on the “puzzling things in life, nature, science, weather, climate change, technology, and recent news” — along with Lewis, his co-author for this post who holds a Ph.D., show that Soros donated money to CEL and “its projects, Color of Change (CoC) and Presenté.”
(snip)
CEL is co-directed by James Rucker, who co-founded Color of Change with Van Jones in 2005 to help “strengthen Black America’s political voice”.
Forecast the Facts Pushes Man Made Climate Change on Skeptical MeteorologistsAccording to the press release, Forecast the Facts was established to “pressure TV meteorologists to inform their viewers about climate change”
(snip)
No thanks.
I’m sticking with “bitter clinger”.
Have ANY of their "models" ever worked? Katrina had seven possible projected patterns from their models and it ended up like none of them. They can't predict weather 5 days out muchless 150 years!
And we are the "deniers"? How about denying the reality that the models don't work!
Are any of our activist organizations countering this by pressuring the media to call warmists “hoaxsters”?
Do we have any activist organizations?
Winston examined the four slips of paper which he had unrolled. Each contained a message of only one or two lines, in the abbreviated jargon -- not actually Newspeak, but consisting largely of Newspeak words -- which was used in the Ministry for internal purposes. They ran:
times 17.3.84 bb speech malreported africa rectify
times 19.12.83 forecasts 3 yp 4th quarter 83 misprints verify current issue
times 14.2.84 miniplenty malquoted chocolate rectify
times 3.12.83 reporting bb dayorder doubleplusungood refs unpersons rewrite fullwise upsub antefiling
With a faint feeling of satisfaction Winston laid the fourth message aside. It was an intricate and responsible job and had better be dealt with last. The other three were routine matters, though the second one would probably mean some tedious wading through lists of figures.
Winston dialled 'back numbers' on the telescreen and called for the appropriate issues of The Times, which slid out of the pneumatic tube after only a few minutes' delay. The messages he had received referred to articles or news items which for one reason or another it was thought necessary to alter, or, as the official phrase had it, to rectify.…
I used to think being skeptical about claims of anthropogenic global warming was akin to being a phlogiston denier. It seems it’s more akin to being a Piltdown Man denier.
Why not use heretic as climate change is a cult religion with an absolute dogma? This is the beginning of a climate change Inquisition.