I don’t see a problem with the article. It seems like a fair analysis of Scott Walker’s career and reasonably positive.
Not every article that is written about a political candidate is going to be gushingly positive and declaring the candidate the second coming. In fact those sorts of articles come off as propaganda and are usually ignored by readers after the first paragraph. You’re dealing with a public whose BS sensors are set to 100%.
It isn’t the history, it’s the framing of it that is telling.
Evil triumphs when good men do nothing