If you come to Texas and shoot somebody we will shoot you back!
We do in most places anyway.
Don’t mess with Texas. Unless it’s on an Army base where everyone is disarmed.
Maybe they just never should have messed with Texas!
“why would anyone do something as provocative as hosting a ‘Muhammad drawing contest,’”
Because when politeness is interpreted as submission, the only viable option is belligerence.
Colloquially dubbed “the Streisand effect”.
Somebodies dogma just got run over by some karma. The kind of gun control I like, one that leaves the crazy Muzzy dead. Another minion of Mad Moe in the hole!
These were not terror pros. If they had been well trained and supplied, something would have gone boom. Shooting back won’t stop that.
This is becoming scarier by the day, as our alleged commander in chief gives away the store.
Poke fun at Mohammmy, two jihadists dead. I’d say that was a successful event.
Why all the worry about provoking the Islamists.. they are ALREADY provoked. They provoked themselves.
It was the same during the Cold War. Be nice to the Soviets else you'll play into the hands of the hard-liners, there will be war, and it will be our fault.
Reagan wasn't nice and we won.
Now we need a Reagan who will destroy the Islamists.
Security provided by Smith & Wesson.
*I* would love to be the first person on *my* block to arrange for a 9th Century knuckledragging jihadi to meet his virgins.
I believe the limits of FREEDOM OF SPEECH were redrawn when Falwell lost his case against Larry Flint in the SCOTUS.
Flint was known for printing the most vile anti-Christian cartoons in his magazine Hustler, and printed a vile add about Falwell.
The Mohammed cartoons were mild compared to those Flint published.
If you come to Texas and shoot somebody we will shoot you back!
um.. no.
In Texas, we shoot back!
Up North, they would be lamenting the use of lethal force against these poor men who were provoked by right wing terrorists, offering their relatives citizenship and a payoff, and investigating the officers involved for murder while apologizing to all the other followers of religion of peace .
Rush was spot on today when he pointed out that a muslim who will kill you for drawing mohammed will also kill you for being a homosexual. Perfect example of leftist cognitive dissonance.
Gets down to another core First Amendment issue. The “scripture” of the Koran appears to state many doctrines that violate our guaranteed freedoms under the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Most followers of Islam believe that Allah’s word as revealed in the Koran is sacred above all other laws of man or religious doctrine. When followers of Islam assert the doctrines of the Koran over others who are not Muslims or over any Americans in detriment to their natural and civil rights, then we feel that Islam must yield. When followers of Islam use violence or the threat of violence to coerce people into adhering to their religious doctrines, that is called terrorism.
The quandary occurs when this is considered with the natural inalienable right of conscience and another First Amendment prohibition/right: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”
Surely Muslims, Christians, Jews, etc. have the right to believe whatever doctrine they wish and to hold that as the one word of God. Surely the government may not reach in and change religious doctrine or scripture. However, where are the exact limits of exercise of that right of conscience/religion which ranges from the extreme Muslim shooting of cartoonists, to pharmacists refusing to provide morning after pills, to Christians refusing to bake a wedding cake? Conversely, where is the boundary placed on the state in compelling behavior contrary to individual’s religious belief on behalf of an other’s rights? ...Interesting....
Entering Maine, jahadist coming here will collect their 72 virgins.
Waiting for the Koran flushing contest........
That should bring ‘em out of the woodwork.......
