Skip to comments.
Clinton Foundation stench driving away donors: Politico
Hot Air ^
| 4-30-15
| Ed Morrissey
Posted on 05/01/2015 8:11:02 PM PDT by TurboZamboni
Gee, I wonder why? After all, many of them havent yet been identified. Ken Vogel explains that the publicity surrounding the influence-peddling schemes at chez Clinton has potential donors looking elsewhere, but
does that apply to those who still want to buy influence? Hmmm.
Actually, the fact that so little goes to charity and that the rate (6.4% in 2013) has become so public is what has them rethinking their commitments:
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cankles; charity; clinton; clintoncrimefamily; clintondonors; clintonfoundation; clintons; fundingtheleft; hillary2016; nonprofit; stench; thieves; whores
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
6.4%
Even more outrageous than most typical leftist 'non-profits'.
To: TurboZamboni
Chatwal allegedly helped arrange one of Bill Clintons most lucrative public speeches a $450,000 affair in London and once said, Even my close friend Hillary Clinton was not in favor of the deal [in 2006]
But when I put the whole package together, she also came on board.
In politics nothing comes free. You have to write cheques in the American political system.With the Clintons marks have to pay to use the toilet paper in the 25 cent bathroom stall...
2
posted on
05/01/2015 8:19:02 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(The thugs loot stores. The community leaders loot cities. - Daniel Greenfield)
To: Liz
Chatwal allegedly helped arrange one of Bill Clintons most lucrative public speeches a $450,000 affair in London and once said, Even my close friend Hillary Clinton was not in favor of the deal [in 2006]
But when I put the whole package together, she also came on board.
In politics nothing comes free. You have to write cheques in the American political system.With the Clintons marks have to pay to use the toilet paper in the 25 cent bathroom stall...
3
posted on
05/01/2015 8:19:11 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(The thugs loot stores. The community leaders loot cities. - Daniel Greenfield)
To: TurboZamboni
wrong
They are just shifting donations to her campaign
4
posted on
05/01/2015 8:19:46 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Clearly Cruz 2016)
To: TurboZamboni
6.4%
Remember, they have salaries to pay, palms to grease, bennies to provide, rent, 1st class travel, 5 star hotels, gourmet food....it isn't cheap to be 'generous'.
5
posted on
05/01/2015 8:22:01 PM PDT
by
JPG
(Lefty reporters doing battle with Sen. Cruz will continue to be chewed-up and spit-out.)
To: TurboZamboni
Too funny! My heart bleeds...as if they do not have enough money already. Hey, Hildabeast—you have enough money, why do you want to be president? It is all about power, the corrupting influence of power. We have had enough of the Clinton Crime Corruption Legacy. No Hildabeast, you will never be president, precluding the possibility of furthering our fall into the evil pit of socialism, an anachronism for communism.
6
posted on
05/01/2015 8:23:59 PM PDT
by
Fungi
(Job 26:7 : He stretcheth out the north over empty space, And hangeth the earth upon nothing.)
To: TurboZamboni
They might just be betting against her now. If they don't expect her to win she has nothing left to sell except perhaps her silence.
No one puts money down on the horse with a broken leg.
7
posted on
05/01/2015 8:32:20 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Darth Obama on 529 plans: I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.)
To: TurboZamboni
The Scent of a Sociopath.
8
posted on
05/01/2015 8:38:10 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: TurboZamboni; GOPJ; stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy; ...
RE:”
Actually, the fact that so little goes to charity and that the rate (6.4% in 2013) has become so public is what has them rethinking their commitments:” 93.6% of donations to Clinton foundation are spent by them on themselves, overhead, management perks and salaries, etc, only 6.4% goes to the causes that they are raised for.
Is there a charity in history with this bad of a record??
OK, the Federal government could tie with them.
Suckers!
9
posted on
05/01/2015 8:57:29 PM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: sickoflibs
If that’s a charity, I’m Judy Tenuta.
To: sickoflibs
It really is a travel slush fund for the Clintons and their friends. I’ll bet those trips to ‘help the poor’ are lavish beyond words...
11
posted on
05/01/2015 9:04:16 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(The thugs loot stores. The community leaders loot cities. - Daniel Greenfield)
To: GOPJ
Let us not forget that that 6.4% goes to other charities in the form of grants. Those charities spend an certain amount of the money on their expenses. So the actual amount that goes to helping people is minuscule.
12
posted on
05/01/2015 9:16:30 PM PDT
by
glabbe
To: fieldmarshaldj; GOPJ; Gilbo_3
RE:”
If thats a charity, Im Judy Tenuta.” Wadda you two?
Sexists or sumthin?
Its her turn.
Wimmin have waited long enough.
13
posted on
05/01/2015 9:26:50 PM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: sickoflibs
even sosh security is a better ‘investment’.
14
posted on
05/01/2015 9:34:41 PM PDT
by
TurboZamboni
(Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
To: All
They’ll keep giving once this blows over. They know how vindictive the Clintons are. If she gets in the white house those donors who stopped giving are in for a world of hurt and they know it.
15
posted on
05/01/2015 9:38:07 PM PDT
by
VerySadAmerican
(Obama voters are my enemy. And so are RINO voters.)
To: glabbe
Bill and Hill are the
"Jim and Tammy Faye of Philanthropy." At this point, people should know what they're getting. It's not as though the Clintons just woke up last week and decided to try to skim a little off the top.
It's been many years and many, many millions.
To: sickoflibs
There’s no way they could have spent that much money on themselves. First of all, there are lots of people cashing in on this scam. Second, the Clintons haven’t paid for anything since high school.
17
posted on
05/01/2015 9:40:14 PM PDT
by
VerySadAmerican
(Obama voters are my enemy. And so are RINO voters.)
To: TurboZamboni
If I were one of the purchasers of Clinton influence, I would be concerned that there are so many doing this. What are the chances that they will perform my favor? What if my favor conflicts with someone elses? Are there auctions?
18
posted on
05/01/2015 10:00:57 PM PDT
by
mom.mom
To: TontoKowalski
19
posted on
05/01/2015 10:04:05 PM PDT
by
glabbe
To: TurboZamboni
Baloney!
20
posted on
05/01/2015 10:05:35 PM PDT
by
sport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson