To: SeekAndFind
"Dowager Empress"What????
2 posted on
04/23/2015 1:29:06 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
( I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am ...)
To: SeekAndFind
Poor old witch,everybody’s trying to drop a house on her.
(I’m loving every minute of this!)
4 posted on
04/23/2015 1:30:47 PM PDT by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: SeekAndFind
Then, when will she give her last screech?
5 posted on
04/23/2015 1:31:13 PM PDT by
The_Media_never_lie
(The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
To: SeekAndFind
HILLARY EXPLAINS WHY PEOPLE ARE TIRED OF HILLARY
8 posted on
04/23/2015 1:33:21 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
(It IS as BAD as you think and they ARE out to get you.)
To: SeekAndFind
OK, it stinks and looks really bad, but is it criminal? What exactly did the Clintons do in return for the "donation?" Was State Dept approval of the deal required? Was it a quid pro quo? If not, expect the usual Clinton-apologists to claim it's all a witch-hunt, right-wing conspiracy,"no one's sayin' Ah did anythin' wrong," blah, blah.
Remember, the Clintons are harder to kill than cockroaches and not nearly as lovable.
10 posted on
04/23/2015 1:34:48 PM PDT by
Martin Tell
(Victrix causa diis placuit sed victa Catoni.)
To: SeekAndFind
But...but...but IT’S HER TURN!
14 posted on
04/23/2015 1:37:30 PM PDT by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & Ifwater the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: SeekAndFind; All
NEW YORK TIMES DECLARE ARKANSAS HILL BILLYS RADIO ACTIVE
15 posted on
04/23/2015 1:38:12 PM PDT by
mosesdapoet
(Some of my best rebuttals are in FR's along with meaningless venting no one reads.)
To: SeekAndFind
Hillary is just sailing along until 20Jan17 when she’ll be sworn in , LOL
16 posted on
04/23/2015 1:38:57 PM PDT by
molson209
(Blank)
To: SeekAndFind
What difference does it make? Her followers won’t understand what the Times brought up. Its of no interest to them, they are completely robotic when it comes to Hillary. “All hail Hillery, victory will be ours.” That’s what it has come down to. The bureau of Hillary Media Propaganda will triumph.
23 posted on
04/23/2015 1:52:49 PM PDT by
Bringbackthedraft
(2016 The RNC better come up with a Winner this time. Run some one like Cruz and Go for Broke!)
To: SeekAndFind
24 posted on
04/23/2015 1:52:59 PM PDT by
dynachrome
(Government can't give us anything that it doesn't first take away)
To: SeekAndFind
She can thank O’bama for her ‘lost chance’ at potus run. Probably thought the upstart as JV team, until ‘lots’ of Dems went over his side real early on in the primaries.
The feud between these two camps for the years to come will be Veeeery Inter-resting.
27 posted on
04/23/2015 1:58:40 PM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: SeekAndFind
I wonder what is with all of this piling on of Hitlery? I thought they loved her as much as they do Obama. sarc/
28 posted on
04/23/2015 2:04:03 PM PDT by
Jean2
(ox)
To: SeekAndFind; kingattax
She will NEVER admit to failure. Even when the world sees her as a humiliated woman she will not recognize it.
She is going to have a very difficult time convincing the voters that she would be a worthwhile president, other than her stalwart supporters - hookers and gays.
No matter how much money she is able to throw at us, she is through.
32 posted on
04/23/2015 2:14:58 PM PDT by
Slyfox
(If I'm ever accused of being a Christian, I'd like there to be enough evidence to convict me)
To: SeekAndFind
Hmmmm, this stinks to the high heaven. On one hand I would love to believe that the MSM is awakening from its Obama love fest slumber in an attempt to reclaim credibility. But I just can’t believe that. That leaves, in my mind, two possibilities:
One: The MSM is not happy with having the Clinton wing (who they view as centrist) as the nominee and want to knock her out for another candidate.
Two: They know she has a mile of baggage and want to get it all OUT and out of the way as soon as possible. That way, come election time, the old playbook of “that is old news” can be trotted out again.
I suspect it is option No. 2.
To: SeekAndFind
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.
***
That was so long ago! What difference does it make?
When will people come to understand that the Clintons are not subject to the laws which govern us little people?
44 posted on
04/23/2015 3:46:10 PM PDT by
Bigg Red
(Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
To: SeekAndFind
Dowager Empress
Now THAT is funny , I don’t care who you are.
49 posted on
04/23/2015 4:09:52 PM PDT by
Cyman
(We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
To: SeekAndFind
While this is
extremely serious, just wait till we find out the Clinton Foundation got "donations" from people who have close ties to or are even members of the Egyptian
Muslim Brotherhood--a group with known close ties to
al-Qaeda and ISIS.
THAT will finish Hillary's candidacy, and could land both her and (likely) her husband in a lot of legal hot water.
We may be talking an international political scandal that rivals the political scandals we've seen historically in other countries.
51 posted on
04/23/2015 7:20:34 PM PDT by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson