To: SeekAndFind
OK, it stinks and looks really bad, but is it criminal? What exactly did the Clintons do in return for the "donation?" Was State Dept approval of the deal required? Was it a quid pro quo? If not, expect the usual Clinton-apologists to claim it's all a witch-hunt, right-wing conspiracy,"no one's sayin' Ah did anythin' wrong," blah, blah.
Remember, the Clintons are harder to kill than cockroaches and not nearly as lovable.
10 posted on
04/23/2015 1:34:48 PM PDT by
Martin Tell
(Victrix causa diis placuit sed victa Catoni.)
To: Martin Tell
RE: OK, it stinks and looks really bad, but is it criminal? What exactly did the Clintons do in return for the “donation?”
Some of the 30,000 emails that were erased on her server would have lead us to the answer...
Nixon almost got impeached for 19 minutes of missing tapes. Hillary? She’s still scott free... is this progress?
To: Martin Tell
OK, it stinks and looks really bad, but is it criminal? Yes, at least according to Rush. He said that there is a specific statute relating to this.
Will she be prosecuted? No, unless Obama wants her to be prosecuted.
21 posted on
04/23/2015 1:40:09 PM PDT by
St_Thomas_Aquinas
( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
To: Martin Tell
Say hello to President Hillary in 2017. Satan takes care of his own.
33 posted on
04/23/2015 2:15:18 PM PDT by
elcid1970
("O Muslim! My bullets are dipped in pig grease.")
To: Martin Tell
We might not be able to get her for being a traitor - but we can damn sure stop almost everyone except blacks from voting for her. Most Americans aren’t impressed with criminals.
41 posted on
04/23/2015 3:14:53 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(Dead Broke Hillary Dodged Sniper Fire With Her Immigrant Parents In Tuzla - Steyn)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson