Skip to comments.
Manchin: Gun Control ‘Made Sense’ in 2013, And ‘It Makes Sense Now’
breitbart.com ^
| 4/22/2015
| AWR Hawkins
Posted on 04/22/2015 8:30:39 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Geez joe and joe. If you keep up all this fuzzy feel good talking point crap you may just be in line for a shannon t watts man of the year award. Or something. The momunists will be proud of you both. As well as nannie bloomers. Say there joe manchin, will bloomers be dumping any money into your campaign?
1
posted on
04/22/2015 8:30:39 AM PDT
by
rktman
To: rktman
I can't believe I sent that SOB money.
He's a liar clean through.
2
posted on
04/22/2015 8:33:56 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If obama speaks and th<uere is no one the<ire to hear it, is it still a lie?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Dem. = Gun confiscation. Remember that at all times.
note GOP some times does to :(
3
posted on
04/22/2015 8:36:00 AM PDT
by
Bidimus1
To: rktman
Manchin: Gun Control Made Sense in 2013, And It Makes Sense NowThey were horse's azz's in 2013 and they are horse's azz's now.
4
posted on
04/22/2015 8:36:30 AM PDT
by
GoldenPup
To: rktman
Their version of gun control ony makes sense to tyrants intent on disarming the citizens.
5
posted on
04/22/2015 8:37:03 AM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: rktman
Not one of the gun grabbers’ feel good laws would have prevented the tragedy at Newton.
6
posted on
04/22/2015 8:38:51 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
You could have bought some ammo with that money.
7
posted on
04/22/2015 8:40:13 AM PDT
by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: Blood of Tyrants
But, we know that’s not the point anyway. Some of us are actually smarter than the park ranger.
8
posted on
04/22/2015 8:40:25 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
To: Bidimus1
I didn’t realize he was a Dem. I am thinking of a Republican I sent money to who betrayed us. The name is almost on the tip of my tongue, but I just can’t get it.
9
posted on
04/22/2015 8:40:32 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If obama speaks and th<uere is no one the<ire to hear it, is it still a lie?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why did you send Joe Manchin money?
To: rktman
Too bad Joe didn’t say this in the commercials he ran with him shooting a bullet through Obamacare regulations. What a total fraud.
11
posted on
04/22/2015 8:40:42 AM PDT
by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: rktman
Climate Control? Gun Control? Banking Control? Business Regulation Control? Healthcare Control? Transportation Control? Law Enforcement Control?
When can we talk about getting control of our government?
(I suppose that is rhetorical.)
12
posted on
04/22/2015 8:42:08 AM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
(POPOF. President Of Pants On Fire.)
To: rktman
“one a republican” IN NAME ONLY.
13
posted on
04/22/2015 8:42:32 AM PDT
by
Lee'sGhost
("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
To: rktman
We all agree that the Sandy Hook massacre was horrendous—but there will always be the mentally ill among.
If just one teacher or the principal were allowed to be armed, these school shootings would stop in a heartbeat.
Alternatively, if the schools hired armed guards, we’d never hear of another child massacre.
Our public school children are setting ducks!
14
posted on
04/22/2015 8:43:58 AM PDT
by
basil
(2ASisters.org)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Joe Manchin. If there is a more craven, opportunistic, than this POS, in politics, I haven’t seen him/her.
15
posted on
04/22/2015 8:44:00 AM PDT
by
LeonardFMason
(LanceyHoward would AGREE)
To: rktman
16
posted on
04/22/2015 8:45:41 AM PDT
by
Mozilla
To: E. Pluribus Unum
You probably meant Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. Johnson worked with Manchin on the bill that the house shot down. Johsnon was supposed to be against gun control and he went and draft legislation. But when it failed, he backtracked and refused to do further attempts. In other words, he was scared of losing any future elections by supporting gun control.
17
posted on
04/22/2015 8:49:55 AM PDT
by
Mozilla
To: rktman
does it make sense to expect a school principal to face a deranged armed assailant with her bare hands? that is what ‘gun control’ does.
18
posted on
04/22/2015 8:50:52 AM PDT
by
camle
(keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
To: Mozilla
Better not let mikey bloomberg hear that. As far as he’s concerned, those uppity black folks should be the last people that should be trusted with guns. Oh, he didn’t say that at the Ass-pen institute? Well, he didn’t WANT anybody to know that he said that. Guess it got his bloomers in a wad when it leaked.
19
posted on
04/22/2015 8:54:05 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
He’s a dimocrat.....why did you send any in the first place??
20
posted on
04/22/2015 8:54:50 AM PDT
by
ealgeone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson