For a scenario like that to work, your likely mutations and your requirements would have to line up very well.
It sounds positively providential, in fact. There really is no escape along those lines.
“For a scenario like that to work, your likely mutations and your requirements would have to line up very well.”
“It sounds positively providential, in fact. There really is no escape along those lines.”
The entire article is just one big and bizarre lie. The article is a classic example of using a gigantic lie s the basis for a strawman argument. The article starts off with statements which lie by falsely claiming salamanders are unchanged and not evolved in the geological record. Those statements are bald faced lies, because there is a wealth of fossil evidence and current specimens of hundreds of distinctly different species of salamanders having radically different morphological and other biological characteristics, not to mention the vastly different forms of the thousands of collateral families, genera, and species. Among the existing salamanders alone radical differences in limbs, organs for breathing, and means of eating prey make them distinctly different and not at all the same animal species.
The people who published the article should be ashamed of themselves for publishing such blatant deceit, and that is regardless of whether or not they choose to irrationally believe in young Earth creationism.