Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VIDEO: Yesterday's Spacex Falcon landing attempt
Spacex ^ | Aptil 15, 2015 | SpaceX

Posted on 04/15/2015 5:06:04 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer

Here is the video:

SpaceX CRS-6 First Stage Landing


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 04/15/2015 5:06:04 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Seems like an overcomplication to me.

We landed a rover on mars by lowering it from hovering rockets and it was pulled off by onboard computers.


2 posted on 04/15/2015 5:09:11 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Looked to be a little to much wind. I suspect the next try will succeed.


3 posted on 04/15/2015 5:10:35 PM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (The last suit you wear has no pockets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Quite a surreal bit of video there.

The booster seemed much closer to the camera until the moment it lowered onto the platform.

You could see the jets trying to compensate, but it just wasn’t enough.

The rocking motion coming in was rather signification IMO.

Came pretty close none the less it seemed.


4 posted on 04/15/2015 5:12:44 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

two chances to get blown up - great


5 posted on 04/15/2015 5:12:50 PM PDT by telstar12.5 (...always bring gunships to a gun fight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: telstar12.5

This part of the flight will never have a human near it.


6 posted on 04/15/2015 5:14:43 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Same with launches.


7 posted on 04/15/2015 5:17:04 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules
Yep. That was a throw-away item anyway, and now they have data. You don't get much data from perfect landings. Screwups without endangering humans is a good thing.

/johnny

8 posted on 04/15/2015 5:24:54 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Dang. That blowed up real good didn’t it?

I watched for this yesterday but didn’t have time to wait.

It is an interesting idea that does not seem to hold much prospect because of vessel motion.


9 posted on 04/15/2015 5:25:35 PM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
"Yep. That was a throw-away item anyway, and now they have data. You don't get much data from perfect landings. Screwups without endangering humans is a good thing."

Absolutely!

I think it's wonderful they're trying, much less got this close. That thing looked pretty stable coming in.

Maybe they just need some big drones to tether it as it's coming down. 3D tugboats. ;-)

10 posted on 04/15/2015 5:32:32 PM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

Why try to land on a moving, unstable platform at sea?


11 posted on 04/15/2015 5:34:39 PM PDT by MisterArtery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Sure seems to me that the attempt would be much more successful if SpaceX would just put a drogue chute on the thing to bleed off most of the speed, then let the rocket motor just deal with the last few feet per second.


12 posted on 04/15/2015 5:35:28 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterArtery

Fewer houses to blow up if you miss.


13 posted on 04/15/2015 5:36:12 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Seems like they had at least a little fuel left?

I was thinking Damn!

Even if its on its side, they still got it.........BOOM!


14 posted on 04/15/2015 5:39:44 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Parachute ‘em into the sea. Auto inflate buoyancy, activate lighting/tracking.

Go get ‘em.


15 posted on 04/15/2015 5:41:51 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

The landing platform needs to be downrange of the launch point - else you need a LOT of fuel to stop the first stage from going east, turn it back west, aim for the coast, then stop and hover and go down slowly.

My preference? Throwaway ribbon parachute, then a gas-filled balloon to slow the descent waaaaaaay down. That rocket thruster was really cycling all over trying to aim at the landing platform.


16 posted on 04/15/2015 5:42:18 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MisterArtery
Why try to land on a moving, unstable platform at sea?

Exactly. They should land the first stage on dry land using parachutes to slow and stabilize (as YoYo stated above) and then use the rockets during the final few meters.

17 posted on 04/15/2015 5:42:33 PM PDT by Blennos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
The landing platform needs to be downrange of the launch point - else you need a LOT of fuel to stop the first stage from going east, turn it back west, aim for the coast, then stop and hover and go down slowly.

This. I though of that after I hit "Post," but it was too late...

18 posted on 04/15/2015 5:46:37 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I guess as long as the enviro-wackos aren’t giving them grief for polluting the ocean.

Seems like the desert would work just as well without the added expense of the platform

But I’m sure they have good reason


19 posted on 04/15/2015 5:48:20 PM PDT by DanielRedfoot (Creepy Ass Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Bigger

Landing

Legs


20 posted on 04/15/2015 5:52:41 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson