Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyPilot

“The Democratic Party for not vetting Pres. Obama before he was nominated, the Republicans and Democrats for not impeaching him, and those who voted for him (especially the second time), and all who choose to ignore what the Bible says.”

The Republicans were also responsible for vetting him and putting the story in front of the American people. Neither John McCain or Mitt Romney would pull of their gloves and really fight. Where was the opposition research?

I also fault George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and senior people in their administration who undoubtedly had the real information about his birth, the marxist relationships of Obama, his parents, and his grandparents. These same officials also knew the truth about his college years (registration as a foreign student?), the after the fact draft card, possible dual citizenship (Indonesia), and his close relationships with radicals such as Bill Ayers. Yet nothing was said even with the nation in peril.

To this day George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush have refrained from commenting on the damage being done to the country. Patriots when the nation is in grave danger? I think not.


10 posted on 04/06/2015 6:17:32 PM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Soul of the South

To this day George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush have refrained from commenting on the damage being done to the country. Patriots when the nation is in grave danger? I think not.


It’s disgraceful.


11 posted on 04/06/2015 6:26:43 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Soul of the South

Really? Bush’s fault? Lol!


12 posted on 04/06/2015 6:28:21 PM PDT by Hugh the Scot ( Total War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Soul of the South

You’re right. Bush and Cheney knew all about him. There are no excuses.


13 posted on 04/06/2015 6:29:22 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Soul of the South
I also fault George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and senior people in their administration who undoubtedly had the real information about his birth, the marxist relationships of Obama, his parents, and his grandparents. These same officials also knew the truth about his college years (registration as a foreign student?), the after the fact draft card, possible dual citizenship (Indonesia), and his close relationships with radicals such as Bill Ayers. Yet nothing was said even with the nation in peril.

Yes, they knew.

They decided to let the sacred "American people make their decision."

One problem with that: massive, MASSIVE voter fraud was greatly responsible for both Obama's 2008 and 2012 "victories." The powers that be don't want to take that on. It would be "racist" and they think they could not control the riots. They didn't (and don't) think they could stop that level of corruption. Well, hey, thanks for nothing.

I actually believe that the evil days that Obama is running with are ordained by God, because God's plan always succeed. I am not saying God wills this evil on us. I believe He would have rescued us from this judgment had we as a nation turned back to Him. But we didn't. And now.......Obama is leading the world into the end days.

15 posted on 04/06/2015 6:36:54 PM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Soul of the South

Inglis v. Trustees (1830) and Elk v. Wilkins (1884), the Supreme Court ruled that a child born on U.S. soil, of a father who owes allegiance to a sovereignty other than the United States, is not a U.S. citizen at birth; the citizenship of such a child is that of its father, not its place of birth [20]. Consequently, the U.S.-born child of a foreign-citizen father cannot be a natural born citizen [41].

Thus, the modern-day consensus opinion (that birthplace alone confers natural born citizenship), though widely held, appears to be an assumption, not settled law or established fact.


33 posted on 04/07/2015 7:42:36 AM PDT by South Dakota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson