[Tired of Taxes]

These activists are doing this wrong.

He should NOT have asked the bakery to make an anti-anything cake. He should’ve asked for a cake that was PRO-traditional marriage. He should’ve asked for wording that was positive for something (not negative) so that it was PRO-marriage.

Then he still would’ve made his point, and the bakery would’ve refused to make the cake, but he might’ve made a better argument in court.

[demshateGod]

He would have lost no matter what because the ruling class’ goal is the suppression of Christianity.

[GeronL]

He asked that the cake be decorated with the biblical verses, "God hates sin. Psalm 45:7"

[bk1000]

“These activists are doing this wrong.
He should NOT have asked the bakery to make an anti-anything cake. He should’ve asked for a cake that was PRO-traditional marriage. He should’ve asked for wording that was positive for something (not negative) so that it was PRO-marriage.
Then he still would’ve made his point, and the bakery would’ve refused to make the cake, but he might’ve made a better argument in court.”

You are absolutely correct. The courts decision was correct given the defamatory request. Had it been a supportive message and they refused, there would be an arguement. The activist did it wrong. Just like demanding a Muslim serve them bacon. If he sold bacon, which he doesn’t, and refused to sell to Christians, you would have a case.