Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Ted Cruz as President Bad for Business? (Not pro-amnesty and cronyism)
Inc. Magazine ^ | March 23, 2015 | Jeremy Quittner

Posted on 03/23/2015 4:12:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Tea Party Republicans get their wish in a Ted Cruz presidential run, but business owners need to think twice.

The Tea Party got at least one wish on Monday, with Ted Cruz throwing his hat in the ring for a presidential run in 2016, the first contender to formally announce.

Although it's unlikely the junior Senator from Texas--also the first Hispanic senator from the Lone Star State--is likely to secure the nomination, he'll surely help define the debate and possibly push it further to the right, policy analysts say. Discussion topics on the table for Cruz, which may be of interest to some businesses, include overturning Obamacare and abolishing the Internal Revenue Service. Those ideas stand in contrast to more mainstream business issues, like arriving at a corporate tax compromise or fixing the broken immigration system, likely to be promulgated by other candidates.

"Cruz's agenda is much more anti-crony capitalism and free enterprise libertarianism than the other potential candidates," says Stan Veuger, a resident scholar and economist at the American Enterprise Institute.

In other words, Cruz is an aggressive free market capitalist who believes in unfettered business, Veuger says, adding that politically Cruz believes in a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. That is borne out, in part, by Cruz's affiliation with the Federalist Society...

(Excerpt) Read more at inc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: amnesty; cronyism; immigration; tedcruz
[scratches head] If he has "no chance" why discuss his stands and "warn" people about him?
1 posted on 03/23/2015 4:12:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

meaning he is not in the pockets of the Chamber of commerce and the Bush’s.


2 posted on 03/23/2015 4:13:27 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

Who the hell writes like that:
Although it’s unlikely —————is likely to secure the nomination....


3 posted on 03/23/2015 4:17:44 PM PDT by exinnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Although it’s unlikely the junior Senator...is likely to secure the nomination”

It may be likely, but it’s unlikely that it’s likely. Got it, Junior?


4 posted on 03/23/2015 4:18:04 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bad for “business”, good for America.


5 posted on 03/23/2015 4:21:28 PM PDT by Politicalkiddo (Proud Millennial for Cruz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am not interested in a pro-business government. But a government that minds its business.


6 posted on 03/23/2015 4:24:56 PM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Cruz and free enterprise? A winner.

Cruz and cronyism? Not so much......


7 posted on 03/23/2015 4:38:36 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So business now has become infected with the same gimmedat mindset of the urban benefits recipient. It would be nice if we turned this whole moral clock back 150 years.


8 posted on 03/23/2015 4:38:45 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exinnj
"Although it's unlikely the junior Senator from Texas . . . is likely to secure the nomination"

You're correct, it's an awkward construction at best. Their editor must have taken the day off.
9 posted on 03/23/2015 4:44:45 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Would the same article be written for Scott Walker?


10 posted on 03/23/2015 4:59:07 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (Vote Ross in MS01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

To paraphrase the older man in “The Graduat:” “Ethanol.”


11 posted on 03/23/2015 5:02:10 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Crony business interests yes, and that`s another plus in my book!


12 posted on 03/23/2015 5:05:11 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So this is the line for the libtards and establishment RINOs: don’t mention Cruz without saying it’s likely unlikely to likely secure the likely nomination.


13 posted on 03/23/2015 5:28:10 PM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Holy cow are they pi$$ing themselves today or what? Lol


14 posted on 03/23/2015 5:29:27 PM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc
Only bad for those business insiders that encourage the government to hamstring competitors.

That does include most of the super bigs.

15 posted on 03/23/2015 5:46:25 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson