Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats join fight against Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran as details emerge
Washington Times ^ | March 20, 2015 | By Guy Taylor

Posted on 03/20/2015 11:22:14 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

Bipartisan resistance to the Obama administration’s push for a nuclear deal with Iran surged on Capitol Hill on Thursday, even as details emerged about a potential agreement that would allow Tehran to retain up to 6,000 uranium enrichment centrifuges while getting immediate relief from international economic sanctions.

Administration witnesses got an earful from representatives of both parties over the administration’s handling of nuclear negotiations involving the U.S., Iran and other world powers that could be reaching a climax in Geneva this week. Many lawmakers say the White House is flagrantly icing Congress out of the deal.

A bipartisan letter signed by 360 House members warned President Obama on Thursday that Iran can’t get “permanent sanctions relief” unless Congress approves it.

A top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee said the administration is clinging to “preposterous” logic in its pursuit of a deal by the self-imposed deadlines at the end of the month.

Rep. Brad Sherman of California, the committee’s second-ranking Democrat, made the charge during a heated hearing on Iran just hours before The Associated Press reported on a leaked draft of the treaty that Secretary of State John F. Kerry and Iranian negotiators are considering in the final days of negotiation.

One key point of the draft says the U.N. arms embargo on the Islamic republic could be rolled back as a way to entice Iran to curb its nuclear programs.

The most striking revelation centered on the potential concession that would allow Iran to retain 6,000 centrifuges for uranium enrichment — a process than can lead to nuclear weapons grade material — for the next 10 years.

Although the figure would commit the Islamic republic to a 40 percent cut from some 10,000 centrifuges that U.N. weapons inspectors believe it has in operation, the number is notably...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; nukes; obama
FUBO!!
1 posted on 03/20/2015 11:22:14 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Obama may just be petulant enough about this to build a 67 vote coalition against him. One can only hope.


2 posted on 03/20/2015 11:27:18 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Meanwhile... Obama is thinking passing the pipe around people are going to inhale the smoke!


3 posted on 03/20/2015 11:28:07 AM PDT by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Amazing!

Supposedly some terms of the ‘deal’ will not be divulged to the public.

Don’t get no more transparent than that.


4 posted on 03/20/2015 11:29:27 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

American Lawmakers Write Another Letter on Iran
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3269890/posts

Bipartisan letter, signed by 360 lawmakers, will remind Obama that sanctions relief on Iran requires new legislation from Congress.

A bipartisan letter on Iran signed by 360 members of Congress will be sent to President Barack Obama, one of its House signers said on Thursday, according to The Hill.

The letter, similar to the one 47 Senate Republicans recently sent to Tehran’s leaders, reminds the administration that permanent sanctions relief on Iran as part of a deal to rollback its nuclear program would require new legislation from Congress.

It comes as international negotiators approach a March 24 deadline to reach a framework agreement.


5 posted on 03/20/2015 11:29:40 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Why is Iran agreeing to drop from 10,000 centrifuges to 6000 ?

Because they have improved centrifuges coming online that perform much better. They only need 5000 to do the job that used to take 10,000.


6 posted on 03/20/2015 11:30:02 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Simple terms:

We do nothing, they do what they want.


7 posted on 03/20/2015 11:31:56 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

From a treaty standpoint, isn’t it better to say that all they need is 34 against as opposed to 67 to block? Why do they need to override anything?


8 posted on 03/20/2015 11:38:46 AM PDT by Ronniesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Bi-Partisan opposition (Demorats and Replicrats) and Boehner still can't grow a spine.
Bypassing Congress , and all Congressmen still remain quiet
which means that "We The People" have no voice!

Obungler was elected President ,.. not inaugurated as King !
(except in his own mind)
Prepare for American Spring as we have been goaded into it .
9 posted on 03/20/2015 11:40:12 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

From what I have read, the letter from the 47 was never “sent” to Tehran’s leaders, only posted on the website of Cotton, IIRC.


10 posted on 03/20/2015 11:45:28 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Where does the US Senate stand on this?

Other than a few voices in the wilderness, Crickets...


11 posted on 03/20/2015 11:51:38 AM PDT by RedMDer (Privileged to have had parents that taught me the value of work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

That was my understanding. It was an open letter.


12 posted on 03/20/2015 11:53:03 AM PDT by RedMDer (Privileged to have had parents that taught me the value of work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

It was from Arutz Sheva in Israel, so they might not have realized that, over there in Israel.


13 posted on 03/20/2015 12:06:01 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

If the Dems are bolting, the deal must really be a Limburger level document.

I thought they had to pass bills, before they’d reveal or even disagree with what was in them.


14 posted on 03/20/2015 12:37:06 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

That makes sense.


15 posted on 03/20/2015 12:53:17 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson