Posted on 03/15/2015 8:03:19 PM PDT by doug from upland
How exactly did Hillary Clinton's team decide which of her emails should be saved and which ones should be deleted?
Three days after Time Magazine initially reported on Team Clinton’s review process to determine which of her emails were work-related and which were personal, the former secretary of state's people are now saying the examination did include opening and reading each email.
They did not confirm or deny Time's reporting for three days, with no explanation for why it took so long to clarify their deletion process.
John Boehner Expected to Announce New House Investigation Into Clinton Practices State Department Plans to Release Clinton Emails Electronically Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill has released a statement saying that “in wanting the public to understand how robust of a search was conducted, the fact sheet laid out several examples of the methods used by the reviewers to double and triple check they were capturing everything."
The “fact sheet” refers to a question-and-answer document given out after the news conference last week.
The statement continues: "It was not meant to be taken as a list of every approach performed to ensure thoroughness. Those subsequent steps were in addition to reading them all, not in lieu of reading them all. (No different than our explaining such terms were used but not listing every search term used.) We simply took for granted that reading every single email came across as the most important, fundamental and exhaustive step that was performed. The fact sheet should have been clearer every email was read, which we are doing now.”
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Maybe this is even worse. If they actually read every one, there is no danger that a damaging one would slip through.
Hillary’s Spokesperson. Yeah, they read the blogs and then came back and changed their story. Horse Poop, that all we get from the Clintons
I’m sure I believe this.
LOL. I smell “Steph-ina-lotta-poop”.
The emails were individually reviewed after all, lied Hillary! spokesmetrosexual Nick “Ain’t Got No D*ck” Merrill...
I dunno.
For some real strange reason, I do not believe them.
*Nixon’s missing minutes redux*
Sure they did...
The doormat is unfit for dog catcher.
More likely your post #3 is correct.
Let’s see— 55K plus of the submitted emails AND the 6oK or so of the not submitted “edited” emails. At an average of
one email say per a minimum of two- four minutes each comes to.....230,000 to 460,000 minutes or 3833 to 7,666 hours or
160 to 319 days (if one could go 24 hours a day continuously).
How many people would this take who were even security cleared to this. Or not?
What a GD blown up ridiculous self serving obvious lie.
Fairly quickly if you use a computer to do it.
Search terms.... already proven to be a non-compliant near useless means to screen emails. This from the experts in security.
Lying then or lying now? Either way it doesn’t matter: they’re liars.
Rough calculations at my post #14 here. It’s a hell of a lot of time working continuously. No 10 humans could do it, especially not if each was a thread of email back and forths.
Simple. They had to run polls on all of their stories before they could decide which one to use.
Things that are hard to believe. A team of lawyers gets together and decides to write a 9-page response to “the e-mail scandal”. In this 9-page response, the never once mention that they actually READ the e-mails.
Then someone points out that not reading the e-mails, and then deleting them would likely be a felony.
And suddenly, we find out the team of lawyers DID read the e-mails, they simply “forgot” to mention that in their 9-page response.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.