Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Largest, Best Funded Voter Fraud Operation in US History Happening Before Your Eyes
Red Statements ^ | 3/12/2015 | Steven Ahle

Posted on 03/14/2015 3:49:42 AM PDT by HomerBohn

Within the first couple of months of Obama’s illegal immigration executive , at least ninety thousand Social Security cards were issued to illegal aliens. Now Republican Senators led by Ben Sasse and Jeff Sessions are asking the Obama administration to answer questions on how many additional social security cards were issued. The answer is important because it will allow citizens to know just how much money taxpayers are spending to illegal aliens.

Social Security cards are keys of the kingdom to illegal aliens. With them, they are able to access a number of all sorts of benefits, including the Earned Income Tax Credit, Social Security disability payments or Social Security’s supplemental income program. The senators also want to know how much in benefits these illegals have collected. The senators have yet to connect the dots in Obama’s real scheme. Let me help them out.

Social Security cards besides making illegals eligible for benefits, can have a more profound problem for the United States. The cards make it very easy for illegals to register to vote, even in states with voter ID laws. One of the documents accepted for registering to vote is………….Social Security cards. This is dot number one. But administration officials don’t dare instruct the illegals on how to vote and many might not trust them. The Washinton Times explains how easy it would be to add millions of new voters through the democrat’s illegal amnesty.

So how do you get around this? Simple. You have La Raza do it. Yes, La Raza actually teaches illegal immigrants where and how to register and vote. With the advent of so many illegals being able to vote and limited resources, La Raza couldn’t possibly handle the volume or afford to spend the kind of money necessary to facilitate such a huge undertaking.

Obama and congressional democrats along with a huge assist from Eric Holder may shed some light on this, too. What if we add the former ACORN into the mix? No, they aren’t defunct, they just use the democratic playbook, which calls for changing the name of ACORN to NeighborWorks America. That may answer the manpower problem to a large extent, but what about the massive amount of money that would be needed?

Both NeighborWorks America and La Raza have found a huge funding source. The DOJ has sued several banks and made settlements in which the banks have paid 24 billion in fines. One of the banks, CitiCorp was also ordered to pay $50 million to La Raza and NeighborWorks America as part of the settlement. But wait, it doesn’t stop there. Another clause in the agreement makes it possible for La Raza and NeighborWorks America to rake in even larger amounts of money.

Of the remaining money the banks needed to pay in settlements, the banks were able to contribute additional money to La Raza and NeighborWorks America. For every dollar they contribute, it reduces their debt to the government by 2 dollars. That’s some mighty powerful incentive to give generously.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and House Financial Services Chairman Jeb Hensarling have questioned why this money was sent to the two organizations rather than to the alleged victims of the bank’s crime. The administration of course declined to answer. here is part of their letter to Holder:

“It seems that the alleged victims are not the primary beneficiaries of these multi-billion dollar settlements. Instead, the terms in the Justice Department’s two latest settlements look less like consumer relief and more like a scheme to funnel money to politically favored special interest groups.”

“This makes donations to activist groups far more attractive to banks than providing direct relief to injured consumers. As a result, the settlements appear to serve as a vehicle for funding activist groups rather than as a means of securing relief for consumers actually harmed.”

So now, with Social Security cards, manpower and tons of money to go along with the two years before the next presidential election, the largest and most successful voter fraud campaign may alter the course of the elections not to mention the future of the United States.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bensasse; demsvoterfraud; electionfraud; jeffsessions; votefraud; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: GOPJ
Pass a law saying "NO ILLEGAlS" can have any government benefits.

We should do this, they should do that, why don't they do this and that....on and on.

Look up CA prop 187. The people voted, won big, only to have the Feds working in concert with the state co-conspirators burn the ballots and declared their victorious election illegal.

This occurred many years ago, at a time when the rest of the country was warned repeatedly from those in the southwest what was coming. Most just stood gawking or somehow thought it was all humorous thinking it never affect them where they lived.

For decades Americans have begged, screamed, voted, petitioned, protested and demanded relief from this epic invasion. And what has happened in the past 30 years Mr. GOP?

You obviously don't know what you're talking about.

41 posted on 03/14/2015 11:36:33 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass

Hillary, guess what I found....... right where you said it didn’t exist.
“One of the documents accepted for registering to vote is………….Social Security cards.”


42 posted on 03/14/2015 12:05:33 PM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin; Marcella

Only is States that are trying to worm around Voter ID.


43 posted on 03/14/2015 12:07:29 PM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

We have laws, no one will enforce them.

Until we elect people who will enforce the laws we have we should not let them change the laws to benefit those breaking them.


44 posted on 03/14/2015 12:14:48 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

So many criminal traitors...so little time.


45 posted on 03/14/2015 6:09:41 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I think they have to feel the noose tightening.


46 posted on 03/14/2015 8:16:40 PM PDT by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

“It’s odumbo’s plan to win the war without ever firing a shot.”

Actually, yes. Obama is fulfilling Khrushchev’s plan to infiltrate America with agents and change her little by little into a Marxist country. The Soviets trained Communist infiltrators to take over the U.S. from without and they’ve done just that over several generations with their paid operatives in government and the colleges. Getting one of their into the White House is the culmination of that infiltration.

Only a brain-washed or brain-dead population could have elected an Obama, a self-professed hater of America, a man with no administrative or government experience (voting present in Illinois for a few months doesn’t cut it) experience except being a smart arse druggy no one decent remembers, a close friends of fellow Communists, race mongers, violent urban terrorists, and international Jihadist terrorists and their promoters. If Congress and the judiciary want there to still be a free America standing, they need to use every legal means available to stop him right now. The Leftists who voted for Obama will be in for a rude, scary awakening from the Islamists they are enabling.


47 posted on 03/14/2015 10:47:01 PM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass; X-spurt; greeneyes; Jim Robinson; All
“The article did not claim that SS cards were being used as voter ID. Do you know what kind of documentation you need to register to vote ...”

I was rushed for time when I wrote post 35. You made a correct statement - SS cards are NOT used as voter ID (no address is on that card) and NOT used to register to vote.

After the Florida fiasco between Bush and Gore, the federal government wrote new laws affecting all states for federal elections. The Secretary of State, Elections Division, of EVERY state was made the official manager of the master voter list for that state.

Before this law, each county was responsible for the accuracy of the county voter list and that was a mess and there was a reason for that. The county does not have the legal authority to get personal information on a person to determine if a person is a US citizen or not.

Well, wait, let me tell you why I know these things. I was the secretary of our county Republican Party and my husband was the Republican County Chair. I was also traveling Texas for our state party to instruct in Texas Election Law to our Texas County chairmen and election judges/clerks. These new federal laws happened while I was doing this work so I knew exactly what Texas was doing to carry out these new federal laws. Every state had to adjust their election laws to implement these federal laws.

Now, back to determining who is a citizen or not. The Secretary of State DOES have the legal authority to get info. from any state agency on any person who wants to register to vote. These documents include birth certificates and any other legal document that can prove the person is a US citizen - or not.

A prospective voter goes to his/her county courthouse to register to vote. He/she is not yet a voter. The county voter registrar then sends this name to the Secretary of State, Elections Division, and they determine whether or not this person is a US citizen. If he/she is, the county is notified to place the name on their voter list. If he/she is NOT a citizen, the county is notified, and that name is NOT placed on the voter list.

Your Republican County Chair should interview the county clerk or elections director (some counties use the county clerk and some have an elections director), to find out exactly how that person carries out the duty to send the names of these prospective voters to the state elections division to determine citizenship. That is a check the County Chairman can do. The County Chairman can notify the state election director if he/she finds the county election director/county clerk is not performing that job correctly.

There was a time our county clerk was not doing her job correctly in determining the legal address of voters. I spoke to her about that and she did not correct her tactics. I wrote a letter to the state director of elections, and told her the problem. She contacted the county clerk and the county clerk was forced to do that correctly at the next election. Yes, the county clerk was a Democrat and hated my guts for that. I didn't care.

48 posted on 03/14/2015 11:15:08 PM PDT by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

This is all good info. and many counties are doing their duty, but then you still have places (thinking of Cook County, Illinois for one) where we are told with almost absolute certainty that the dead vote, and many people vote illegally and often.


49 posted on 03/14/2015 11:51:44 PM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Le//t Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes; All

“...but then you still have places (thinking of Cook County, Illinois for one) where we are told with almost absolute certainty that the dead vote, and many people vote illegally and often.”

1. Dead people may be on the voter list. A voter card is mailed to a voter and if it comes back to the registrar, that is noted. After that happens for a set number of years, the name is removed. However, after the federal laws came out after Florida, the state registrar is supposed to issue each county, every year I think it is, a list of deceased people who lived in that county. So, there are two ways to remove a dead person’s name.

2. It is difficult to vote twice in one county. A person can vote in his/her voting precinct. If he/she votes in that correct precinct, then goes to vote in another voting precinct, his/her name is not on that precinct’s voting list. If he/she insists on voting in that precinct, he/she votes a provisional ballot and that will not count until the Early Voting Ballot Board checks that paperwork with that ballot. They will find the voter was trying to vote in the wrong precinct, so the ballot will not be counted.

3. If the voter votes correctly in his/her county, then goes to another state to vote, his/her name won’t be on the voter list in that county in that state. It would be voting by provisional ballot again and the ballot wouldn’t be counted.

I think some of the tales of dead people voting (someone using the name of the deceased person) and people voting twice, are due to using provisional ballots. It appears the people are voting, but those ballots will not make it past the board that checks them.

I was the judge of the early voting ballot board in my county, and at every election, we checked provisional ballots the day after the election, and not one provisional ballot was ever counted. The voter was either not on the voter list, period, or voted in the wrong precinct.

That is the point of my post. The Republican County Chairmen is not doing his/her job. They have the legal power to contact the state elections division, and get that stopped. Plus, if the county voter registrar (county clerk or elections director), is willingly breaking the election law in this regard, the district attorney can investigate and file charges, indict that person, as that is a felony. If the district attorney won’t do it, the state attorney general can do it.


50 posted on 03/15/2015 1:37:51 AM PDT by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

I understand that Marcella, and you are absolutely right. However, there is a lack of pubbies in some areas, and I have little faith that certain counties are getting the actual oversight they should.

I also don’t have a lot of faith in some of the Dem Sec. of State to ensure fair elections. I do think my county is likely ok, even though there’s not very many pubbies there observing on election day.

Voter fraud happens. But there’s lots of ways to fight it.


51 posted on 03/15/2015 9:42:21 PM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Le//t Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson