Posted on 03/11/2015 7:22:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
For some reason people seem to be missing what you just explained. I’d take it a step further and state that the recipients of the emails are complicit if they replied to her emails with perhaps the exception of telling her to follow protocol.
She does what she wants and doesn’t care. She’s an elite who is better than the ordinary people who pay her salary.
I should have also added to my response that the recipients of the emails from her personal account, when the subject matter was ‘official’ business, if they replied through the unofficial accounts, thinking it “no big deal, nobody will ever see it”, became proverbial partners in crime, giving opportunity for blackmail.
Her server is humming in the same room where her Rose Law Firm records are stored. When she chose to put Public records on that server, it was no longer a private machine. It needs to be immediately seized by subpena.
Former CIA Director John Deutch had classified stuff on his home computer.
This story says he was pardoned on Clinton’s last day in office:
http://www.wrmea.org/2001-july/why-did-former-cia-director-john-deutch-endanger-america-s-most-vital-secrets.html
What I wouldn't give to have that question posed to Jen Psaki or Marie Harf. I'd have to drink heavily before hearing the answer, but, still.
Thanks for the smart observation.
I'd think that the AP would be complicit in helping the H-Beast with the cover up.
Every time I see or hear the name Clintons the movie The God Father comes to mind.
Las Vegas Review Journal confirmed that the hotel staffs were ordered not to look at her. Other reports told of her “royal porta-potty”. It travels the world with her.
If she had been more forthcoming, the MSM would have propped her up back in the 2008 Presidential campaign, instead of letting one Barack Obama push her aside in no time flat.
In short, keep it up and Hillary Clinton may not even make it to the starting line for the Presidential primary process. If George Soros sees her for what she really is, her political career is over.
‘The server will remain private’, she declared.”
Clintons choose words carefully. Like “remain”. Hillary is selling the notion that the server was “private” during her use of it. But it was set up as part of Bill Clinton’s Presidential Office at taxpayer expense (and his “Office” is located in Harlem).
Ex-Presidents receive funding for maintaining an “office” and per the NYT, Bill Clinton has dipped his hand into the public jar much deeper than his predecessors. But who legally “owns” the items they procure? Logically, they belong to the government. Otherwise, cheats could buy who knows what, have the taxpayers foot the bill, then resell it on eBay. I assert that the server in question is NOT the private property of the Clintons. Hillary has no legal right to prevent inspection of it.
Her assertion that she used the server to communicate with Bill is a backup tactic. If investigators try to subpoena the server, she will argue in court that it is somehow protected Presidential material.
Of equal significance is the protocols involved in receiving and sending top secret material. Unless the server in question was developed and maintained by appropriate government agencies is could not access documents with anything above the lowest tier of secrecy.
We are left to believe that HRC was never privy to secure government documents. If, as she claimed, she corresponded about personal matters 30 thousand times over 5 years, she could not have stepped away from her keyboard for more than a few restless hours of fitful sleep. It would, of course, been more sensible to have lied about a few personal documents.
Claiming such a huge number of personal emails leads one to wonder 1 - what else was did she have time to do? and, 2 - is this another Clinton coverup for a corrupt act not yet discovered?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.