Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Unprecedented Nature of Hillary's Email
self | 10 Mar 2015 | Self

Posted on 03/10/2015 12:51:49 PM PDT by fruser1

There may be precedence of using private email accounts in government, but I don't know of anyone having their own hardware system at their private residence.

Using accounts at google still allows subpoenas to be issued to the ISP such that data can be retrieved from archives, even if the user has deleted them.

Quite frankly, I'm not concerned about Hillary's email to other .gov addresses. I'm sure they're benign. I'm also sure she knows when something is classified. As a Secretary of State, if you wanted to hand off something classified, what better way to do it than in person through the old diplomatic pouch? I mostly discount any "spy" angle here.

But I do not discount the "pay to play" angle here.

The first question of "why?" is still unanswered. Why establish an entire system at home when you can just rent your own webspace from any ISP? Was this because they thought it was cheaper to maintain that hardware themselves? The only feasible reason for this is concealment. You do not have to be a paranoid person to see this.

One thing worth concealing would be "pay to play" arrangements. Hence, I can't help but wonder what policy was manipulated based on donations and what evidence there would be of that on their system.

It'd be easy for her to solicit donations in person and use the private system for subsequent communication. One question not asked at the press conference was if she had any communication with people outside of the country on her private email.

Of course, if she answered in the negative and a subsequent forensic analysis of her system proved the contrary, she'd be in a bit of trouble. However, since she actually owns the hardware, that hardware could be destroyed almost as easily as emails could be deleted. You can bet that all the hard drives and memory on those systems have been replaced by now. A perfect cover up.

Finally, since it is her own system, we are left to take her at her word that there was no email contact with administration officials solely on .gov accounts. I find it hard to believe that there was never any correspondence to the private accounts of other officials especially since, in her own words, "everyone had personal accounts".

And God only knows, what Bill is keeping hidden.

There used to be a bumper sticker out there that said “Question Authority”.

Hillary has a new one that says “Trust Us!”.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: government
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Always A Marine

“Those emails are out there somewhere.”

Yes they are, but you’d either have to know who she corresponded with and check the relevant ISP or do a search of all ISPs on the planet for the duration of her tenure.


21 posted on 03/10/2015 1:20:58 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hlmencken3

Well then the owners of clintonmail.com should be ashamed of themselves (a futile effort to save face on my part).


22 posted on 03/10/2015 1:23:10 PM PDT by jjsheridan5 (The next Ronald Reagan will not be a Republican, but rather a former Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

“Quite frankly, I’m not concerned about Hillary’s email to other .gov addresses. I’m sure they’re benign.”

Huh??

“I’m also sure she knows when something is classified.”

She’ smart?

“As a Secretary of State, if you wanted to hand off something classified, what better way to do it than in person through the old diplomatic pouch? “

She’s smart? actually did any real work?

Had others do the work she’s not capable of?


23 posted on 03/10/2015 1:26:49 PM PDT by Varsity Flight (Extortion-Care is is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

She’s just using her phone. LOL


24 posted on 03/10/2015 1:31:54 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fruser1
Its worse than we thought

the server was in BILLS office...for several years....




25 posted on 03/10/2015 1:33:44 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

This is clearly a well thought out plan to circumvent the law.

Hillary’s server system was put into place in anticipation of exactly the kind of cover up she engaged in after the Benghazi terrorist murders.

So now we have a cover-up of the cover-up.

The Clintons and Obama make Dick Nixon look like a Boy Scout.


26 posted on 03/10/2015 1:35:16 PM PDT by Iron Munro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1
The Republicans need to beat her at her own game. It's time to "dump" some very incriminating Hilary e-mails in the press, on the internet, all through social media.

Who cares whether they are real or not? Why not make them up? They could be real. You know, "fake but accurate."

The point is that without the server itself being made available in an "unscrubbed" condition, how does she effectively deny the existence of any alleged e-mail that comes to light?

27 posted on 03/10/2015 1:37:15 PM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

allow me to present fake but accurate....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3266419/posts?page=25#25

Bill and Hillary leaving the whitehouse with the Clinton Server....BILL’s that is...


28 posted on 03/10/2015 1:40:20 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

Mikey, I can tell that’s a photoshopped keyboard. A real White House keyboard would have had the “W” key peeled off. ;)

Seriously, nice photo of the happy couple. Too bad it’s as they leave the White House, not entering a penitentiary where they belong.


29 posted on 03/10/2015 1:43:25 PM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Part of the “why” is that the people she emailed with using the private address willfully broke the law as well, if they were doing government business.


30 posted on 03/10/2015 1:44:03 PM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

ahahah I had Thought about the W’s but realized....that a missing wouldnt likely have been visible....

” Too bad it’s as they leave the White House, not entering a penitentiary where they belong.”

I think that can be arranged given a few minutes..


31 posted on 03/10/2015 1:45:21 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mygirlsmom
And the party she was corresponding with.

And who would presumably have as much to lose as she if their messages got into the wrong hands.

32 posted on 03/10/2015 1:49:17 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

” but I will point out that Hillary Clinton has never struck me as a “rocket science” level of intellect. She’s about as dumb as they come. “

She was kicked off the Watergate investigation by a lifer Democrat who couldn’t take anymore of her lying, and fraud. Nothing has changed.


33 posted on 03/10/2015 1:50:00 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Unless they use the threat of disclosing the information to blackmail her. That’s my point.


34 posted on 03/10/2015 1:50:23 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Our Prez says he's never rec'd an email from the SOS. Time to check his SPAM folder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Varsity Flight

“Huh??”

In other words, she deliberately used private to private email for corrupt purposes and would only use private to gov if it were “safe”, the entire intent behind the home server.


35 posted on 03/10/2015 1:55:19 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

It doesn’t matter if Hillary committed 20 felonies a day, on video, in public, with 2,000 witnesses.

She is of the protected class and will never be held accountable in any way for anything. EVER. Short of murder she can commit just about any crime she wants with total impunity (and even then she might get away with murder when she declares her prosecution a ‘war on women’).

In the world of Progressives there is no such thing as actual criminal activity. All crime is either inadvertent or the result of oppression from some outside group so it can always be rationalized and ignored.


36 posted on 03/10/2015 2:12:06 PM PDT by navyguy (The National Reset Button is pushed with the trigger finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

“As a Secretary of State, if you wanted to hand off something classified, what better way to do it than in person through the old diplomatic pouch?”

As SoS, if you wanted to hand off something classified to someone you’re not supposed to be having connections to at all (say, gunrunners in Libya planning to attack the US Embassy there), what better way to do it than store relevant emails on a “secure but hackable” private off-site server? No physical trace/contact, erasable logs.


37 posted on 03/10/2015 2:13:23 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1
 photo 9dfad742-108d-4243-87e0-e585610bbe40_zpsl7b5v3uf.jpg
38 posted on 03/10/2015 2:13:25 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax
 photo da3339aa-ea14-43ae-b349-ac9c82adb5cd_zpsktrdozc8.jpg
39 posted on 03/10/2015 2:18:04 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Carthego delenda est
the people she emailed with using the private address willfully broke the law as well, if they were doing government business.

I believe that external parties were not breaking the law. They never signed on the dotted line, and it is not their duty to know who is and who is not subject to what regulations. Furthermore, they had no way to know that clintonemail.com is not ran by the State Dept. IT - and it could have been.

40 posted on 03/10/2015 2:18:24 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson