http://www.antiwar.com/utley/?articleid=9456
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjMRgT5o-Ig
Some Theses:
The Jews of today are not entitled, on any theological basis, to occupy the Holy Land. The Jews lost that entitlement on Good Friday.
The extent to which modern Christian support of the modern State of Israel is based on “Armageddonism” is not sufficiently discussed.
Muslims have no right to occupy the Holy Land, either, and the Muslim nations will eventually be destroyed by Jesus Christ because they are anti-Christ.
I am interested in comments.
“The Jews of today are not entitled, on any theological basis, to occupy the Holy Land. The Jews lost that entitlement on Good Friday.”
Nonsense. Prophecy said they would return, and they did. And they don’t get uprooted again. And they accept their messiah (whoever he turns out to be) and become a light to the world.
That’s what’s in the scripture.
“I will strengthen Judah
and save the tribes of Joseph.
I will restore them
because I have compassion on them.
They will be as though
I had not rejected them,
for I am the Lord their God
and I will answer them.
7 The Ephraimites will become like warriors,
and their hearts will be glad as with wine.
Their children will see it and be joyful;
their hearts will rejoice in the Lord.
8 I will signal for them
and gather them in.
Surely I will redeem them;
they will be as numerous as before.
9 Though I scatter them among the peoples,
yet in distant lands they will remember me.
They and their children will survive,
and they will return.
(See Zech
Nope. Though that is the historic chrstian position of which American Fundamentalist Protestants are so ignorant. I welcome American Fundamentalists accepting that their religion is not historical chrstianity but is in fact something quite different. Then they would have to make up their minds which to choose and some (maybe most) of them will chose the Noachide Laws.
The extent to which modern Christian support of the modern State of Israel is based on “Armageddonism” is not sufficiently discussed.
Historical chrstianity's rejection of a future messianic advent (in favor of a past one that supposedly fulfilled all prophecies "allegorically") is not discussed often enough. But I agree: people should support Jews in Israel because of the Torah, not the "new testament."
Muslims have no right to occupy the Holy Land, either, and the Muslim nations will eventually be destroyed by Jesus Christ because they are anti-Christ.
So, since you reject both Jews and moslems as the true inhabitants, that must mean you want 'Eretz Yisra'el turned into a big international park run by the United Nations. That is the Catholic position, is it not? Not like you guys actually want it.
I am interested in comments.
You just got some. You're welcome.