Nope. Though that is the historic chrstian position of which American Fundamentalist Protestants are so ignorant. I welcome American Fundamentalists accepting that their religion is not historical chrstianity but is in fact something quite different. Then they would have to make up their minds which to choose and some (maybe most) of them will chose the Noachide Laws.
The extent to which modern Christian support of the modern State of Israel is based on “Armageddonism” is not sufficiently discussed.
Historical chrstianity's rejection of a future messianic advent (in favor of a past one that supposedly fulfilled all prophecies "allegorically") is not discussed often enough. But I agree: people should support Jews in Israel because of the Torah, not the "new testament."
Muslims have no right to occupy the Holy Land, either, and the Muslim nations will eventually be destroyed by Jesus Christ because they are anti-Christ.
So, since you reject both Jews and moslems as the true inhabitants, that must mean you want 'Eretz Yisra'el turned into a big international park run by the United Nations. That is the Catholic position, is it not? Not like you guys actually want it.
I am interested in comments.
You just got some. You're welcome.
Thanks.
My position is extremely vague and fluid. I do tend to favor the side that, whatever their faults, builds businesses and doesn’t wrap their children in nail bombs.