So, by your arguments I’m guessing you are one who thinks the popular vote should decide then?
To me, the whole tenet of the Electoral College and the way the 538 votes are apportioned is to protect regional interests throughout the 50 States, even those states that have small populations. This reasoning protects the totality of this Union - its morals, desires and environment, IMO. If the presidential vote were truly popular vote, the perhaps twenty (or less) cities and counties would decide the presidency every time. I certainly do not want that.
The number of votes in the college is fixed just like in the HoR. For the proportional mix to change one district has to gain in number of residents while others have to lose. IOW, a population shift to other areas. I like this. It’s why Northeastern states are losing seats and southern ones gaining.
If anything, I'd like to see an improvement on the current process by having every state adopt the same process as Maine and Nebraska. Instead of having a winner-take-all electoral vote, the winner of each Congressional district will get the electoral vote for that district ... while the winner for the state overall will get the two electoral votes associated with the two U.S. Senators.
That would be a huge improvement on the current process because every state would have competitive races in at least some of their districts.