Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Progressives, It’s Time to Start Panicking about Hillary
The National Review ^ | March 5, 2015 | Charles C. W. Cooke

Posted on 03/06/2015 2:57:15 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 03/06/2015 2:57:15 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ah,that’s only auntie Hill being auntie Hill!


2 posted on 03/06/2015 2:58:49 AM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nuts. Both houses of Congress are still controlled by Democrats because Boehner, McConnell and about 1/3 of elected Republicans are closet Democrats who come out when their votes are needed to maintain what open Democrats have created.


3 posted on 03/06/2015 3:15:46 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Black Swan in all of this is Hillary’s health. She not young, she drinks more than a bit And I have no idea when she last had sex with the playboy of the western world but Lord knows what he could have brought home to her.


4 posted on 03/06/2015 3:19:03 AM PST by muir_redwoods ("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

>> Nuts. Both houses of Congress are still controlled by Democrats

Had same reaction to 4th sentence.


5 posted on 03/06/2015 3:21:30 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

That Hillary Clinton is even the front-runner for the Democrats is an indication of how old and tired that political party is. When you look at the most prominent leaders of the Democrat Party — Clinton, Harry Reid and Pelosi — you see people who come across as just old and feeble.


6 posted on 03/06/2015 3:27:44 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

From the article..
“and in part this is because the economy will almost certainly be doing well enough by next year”

Much of the data says otherwise


7 posted on 03/06/2015 3:28:47 AM PST by LMAO (("Begging hands and Bleeding hearts will only cry out for more"...Anthem from Rush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Post #3 is exactly correct


8 posted on 03/06/2015 3:31:48 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
No, it's not.

Progressives should remain perfectly calm and exalt their future presidentess. At least until the leaves turn yellow and start falling off the trees in the fall of 2016.

Too good to be true. And not going to happen.

My hunch is the leftards are going to bolt for Granny Warren, the fake affirmative-action Injun from Massachusetts. They just need to get up the nerve. That's what all this stuff about www.clintonemail.com is all about!

9 posted on 03/06/2015 3:35:10 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

The GOP needs, needs to be for bringing back American industry.

93.7 million Americans are now out of the labor force. That continues to grow constantly.

We are now over 18 TRILLI,ON in debt. The problem is, the GOP is nowhere about the most important issue in the world:

American manufacturing. That is what the GOP needs to get behind, and that is what the GOP is completely sold out about.

Bring back JOBS.


10 posted on 03/06/2015 3:42:49 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
... even more radical than George W. Bush’s version and unfettered control of American government.

I'm sorry, but I do not consider an analysis that contains this statement unquestionable. Maybe if it was altered to something like "unfettered American government" I'd believe it. Bush did nothing to reduce the scope and spending IMO. Even worse, he created two of the biggest threats to our liberty not seen in generations: DHS and TSA.

That hitching point aside, there is some merit in the argument Democrats may feel that she is the only one in the way of Republican control of government - including a SC justice pick or two. Granted.

But there are those kooks out there (many it seems by the hype about her) who think Warren is the understudy who will stun Broadway after Hillary breaks her legs (hard to do with calves like that) and can't star in the play. Regardless, if it isn't Warren it will be some other Obama-like Turtle that has been drudged up and concocted.

Here is what Obama is going to do to make sure the sales for that play (no matter who stars) are SRO. He WILL allow 10 Million illegals to register to vote. He will fight lawsuits and connive federal injunctions to allow the process to continue through to the election. Those are the numbers Democrats need to win, and he will give them the votes.

11 posted on 03/06/2015 3:46:38 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
But — and this is a big but

Glad to see that one made it past the editors.

12 posted on 03/06/2015 3:46:56 AM PST by aposiopetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aposiopetic

Harf, Harf, Harf - good one......


13 posted on 03/06/2015 3:51:56 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hillary and Bill are the Gordon Gekkos of politics.


14 posted on 03/06/2015 3:53:14 AM PST by Daveinyork ( Marbury vs.Madison was the biggest power grab in American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

“My hunch is the leftards are going to bolt for Granny Warren, the fake affirmative-action Injun from Massachusetts. They just need to get up the nerve. That’s what all this stuff about www.clintonemail.com is all about! “

Could be. Another theory is that Hillary is self-vetting herself on this issue so that a year from now if a Republican should bring it up, she and her pukes can state that “there you go again, dragging up old news”. Seems to work like a charm.


15 posted on 03/06/2015 3:56:31 AM PST by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

As long as Boner controls the House and turkey neck controls the Senate, the GOP controls NOTHING.


16 posted on 03/06/2015 3:59:22 AM PST by ZULU (Je Suis Charlie. . GET IT OBAMA, OR DON'T YOU??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
I have no idea when she last had sex with the playboy of the western world

August 22, 1979.

17 posted on 03/06/2015 4:04:03 AM PST by USS Alaska (Exterminate the terrorist savages, everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We’re about to see the Furies attack Hillary and destroy her. The act will be very public and extremely nasty.

http://www.mythencyclopedia.com/Fi-Go/Furies.html


18 posted on 03/06/2015 4:09:25 AM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear
Another theory is that Hillary is self-vetting herself on this issue so that a year from now if a Republican should bring it up, she and her pukes can state that “there you go again, dragging up old news”.

I'm starting to wonder if they aren't getting ready to dump all the blame for Benghazi on her to protect Obama. She has enough dirt on him for it to get really messy if she doesn't go along, so part of the deal is that she gets a Presidential pardon on any criminal charges. But for that to work, she'll have to be convicted before he leaves office. He can't grant a pardon for crimes she hasn't been convicted of yet so they need to get in front of it and keep it steered in the right direction.

19 posted on 03/06/2015 4:16:27 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
One flaw in your analysis involves the illegal aliens voting.

To win a presidential election, Democrats don't need 10 million illegal aliens to vote. They simply need them living in the U.S. and counted in the U.S. census. Electoral votes and Congressional seats are apportioned by population, not registered voters. This is why California has 53 seats in the House and 55 electoral votes, even though it probably has some Congressional districts where most of the residents can't vote.

20 posted on 03/06/2015 4:20:39 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson