Posted on 03/05/2015 9:18:20 AM PST by Biggirl
March 5, 2015 A cornered Clinton is a craven Clinton, which is why we should view Hillary Rodham Clinton's latest public relations trick with practiced skepticism. "I want the public to see my email," she tweeted Wednesday night. "I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible."
(Excerpt) Read more at nationaljournal.com ...
How can State release them when State doesn’t have them? They are at Hillary’s house not on a State Department server.
She hasn’t gotten it for a very long time.
This is like finding out Nixon had a secret tape recorder in The White House.
Will there be any “18-minute gaps” - who will be her Rosemary Woods?
The only thing she got is a rapist husband and cankles.
Thanks for the post.
See related thread here.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3264569/posts
The woman is a lot of things, but stupid is not one of them.
The first time I saw her lie was in 1992, "the stand by your man interview". That told me all I needed to know about her: she is a conniving SOB who will say or do anything to achieve her goals.
Saying "she does not get it" is 180 degrees off the mark.
Rush is on to something. Why is the MSM now hammering the Clintons over emails after everything else they ignored?
Exactly. Those emails will never see the light of day. A short while ago the press was wondering where Hillary was...that she'd been out of the public's eye. I think she was given a heads-up on this story breaking, and was hunkered down with whoever installed those private servers for her, making sure all incriminating evidence was destroyed.
The MSM seems to not want her to run. Who then?
It’s like saying Obama is incompetent as evidenced by his “failures” in the economic and foreign policy realms.
...and fired from the Democrat-run Watergate Committee. That was just what Bill thought he wanted: a crooked lawyer that lie at the drop of a hat.
HF
Could it be Senator Elizabeth “ I Play A Native American With High Checks “ Warren?
Agreed. The MSM is very critical of her on this. I am surprised because supposedly she was inevitable as the Dem. Nominee and above criticism of this nature.
And why would anyone have to review them for release? Review for what? Incriminating information?
Because they know she is the weakest possible Democratic candidate, and they want her out.
Or, they are getting this out early to claim they vetted her.
I don’t know what she still doesn’t get.She knows full well that she is above the law and she can do as she please. And she does. what is it she doesn’t get?
They want it to appear she's been vetted. She'll release some emails that are innocuous. What transparency! Democrats want this now so it can appear as laughed off as old history by the end of this year.
What she will have avoided doing in that is including her treasonous emails, many of which concern the Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt, weapons-for-Muslim-cash, embassy security, 17 February Martyrs Brigade, etc.
HF
I think her position is that any e-mails she sent to other government employees on their government e-mail accounts can be retrieved and she is “consenting” to their disclosure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.