Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz’s CPAC Televangelism
The Daily Beast ^ | February 26, 2015 | Olivia Nuzzi

Posted on 02/26/2015 10:00:28 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Ted Cruz, CPAC’s favorite travelling salesman, was back and selling his favorite product: himself.

Ted Cruz is onstage at CPAC. As is his custom he has declined to stand behind the podium and is instead pacing methodically around the stage with a microphone pinned to his blue striped tie.

“To turn this country around it will not come from Washington; it will come from the American people,” he yells. “And so I will ask every one of you if you will join our grassroots army. Take out your cell phone and text the word ‘Constitution’ to the number 33733. Let me give that to you again! Take out your cell phone and text the word ‘Constitution’ to 33733!”

His voice booms throughout the ballroom—speeding up, slowing down, soaring and winding down to a faux-whisper at carefully chosen intervals, like a televangelist or someone trying to sell you a set of steak knives and a Bedazzler at 3 a.m. on an infomercial.

“It will be each of you empowering and energizing we the people that turns the country around!”

A text to 33733 received this automated response: “Together let’s bring bold, clear leadership to America tedcruz.org. Text STOP to end or HELP for help. Msg&Data Rates May Apply. No more than 30 messages/month.”

More than any other likely Republican presidential candidate, Cruz is a salesman.

He understands what his audience wants to hear, and he knows how to say it sweetly.

“This is a room full of patriots,” he says to hoots of approval. “The men and women who are gathered here today are gathered to fight for freedom in our country. And the men and women of CPAC are going to play a fundamental decision in how we turn this country around! The men and women gathered here today are going to play a crucial role in reigniting the miracle of America.”

Cruz begins to talk faster and louder.

The pace and energy of his speech has picked up so much, in fact, that it sounds as though he could start talking in tongues at any second.

“How do we do that, how do we win, how do we bring back the miracle that is America? #1. We reassemble the Reagan coalition. #2. We bring together fiscal conservatives and social conservatives and national security conservatives. We stand strong for economic growth, but we also stand for life and marriage. We defend the constitutional rights, but we also stand and lead the fight against ISIS and a nuclear Iran.”

The crowd is eating it up, and Cruz is beaming.

And now, Cruz is joined onstage by Fox News’ Sean Hannity for a short interview—a part of a new format introduced by Matt Schlapp, the chairman of the American Conservative Union, CPAC’s sponsor.

Schlapp, told The Washington Post that the new format would be more challenging for speakers.

“The Q&A gives them a chance to be spontaneous and to make news—not in a negative way but in a positive way,” he said. “I think it makes them nervous that the format has changed. It could be high-risk, but it could also be very high-reward.”

“HELLOOOOOOO CPAC!” Sean Hannity shouts. “Give it up for Senator Ted Cruz!”

High-risk?

Hannity and Cruz now engage in verbal masturbation, with Hannity repeatedly giving Cruz chances to differentiate himself from his Republican rivals and attack President Obama.

What does Cruz say to his GOP critics?

“The central point is we shouldn’t be listening to Washington. We should be listening to the American people!” And what does Cruz think America should do about ISIS? “We need a commander in chief who will actually stand up and defend the United States of America!”

Doing his best game show host impersonation, Hannity tells Cruz to get ready for the “lightning round!”

Finally, Hannity is going to ask some tough questions.

“What could the top five agenda items of a President Cruz—what would they be?”

Oh.

Cruz, who one imagines has been addressing himself as “President Cruz” in his bathroom mirror every morning since early childhood, was more than ready with a well-thought-out, if puddle-deep list.

And the crowd goes wild.

“#1. Repeal every blasted word of Obamacare!”

Applause.

“#2. Abolish the IRS—take all 125,000 IRS agents and put them on our Southern border!”

Applause.

“#3 Stop the out of control regulators at the EPA Applause.

“#4 Defend out Constitutional rights! All of them!”

Applause.

“#5 Restore America’s leadership in the world as the shining city on the hill!”

Hannity says he has just one more question for Cruz. Perhaps he’s saved the most challenging for last.

“Why does Ted Cruz love America?”

It’s a tough one, for sure, but Cruz is prepared to answer it: “This country is the greatest country in the history of the world! It has been a haven for freedom.”

He remembers his father, who fled from Cuba to this shining city on the hill.

“If we get back to this, brighter days are ahead!”

Remember to text “Constitution” to 33733 to support freedom, but mostly to support Ted Cruz.

Text within the next hour and Cruz will repeal Obamacare and give you a Bedazzler; Text within the next half hour and he will send IRS agents to patrol the U.S.-Mexican border and you get a second Bedazzler free! But text now and Cruz will restore America’s greatness and personally Bedazzle a pair of your favorite jeans.

Text now!


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cpac; cruz; media; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Ted Cruz, CPAC’s favorite travelling salesman, was back and selling his favorite product: himself."

Hey, Olivia! He's likely running for president, fool---who is he supposed to sell? The other prospective candidates?

21 posted on 02/27/2015 7:38:39 AM PST by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Olivia, you piece o poop, what you are describing is OBAMAS COVERAGE NOT JUST AT THE DEM CONVENTION BUT AT NATIONAL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE LEVEL.

This was CPAC. Every day for 6 years, Obama has had this kind of coverage from the national media. Tough questions? Like why do you have so many social security cards? Like, look at all these clips, mr president, where you clearly identified with Muslims. The church you went to was run by a (former) muslim and Muslims see him as muslim. Muslims see YOU as a Muslim. What about you isn’t Muslim? Why won’t you admit that the worst terrorists are Muslim? Why do all the experts say that the online copy of a mismatched birth certificate is fake? Why did you and hillary go around saying benghazi was from a video on YouTube? Why do gay guys from Chicago say they’ve given you BJs? Why do they say you smoked crack as a state senator?

Come on, even Saturday night Live in 2008 had Obamas questions at debates be things like “are you comfortable, Senator? Do you need another pillow?”


22 posted on 02/27/2015 7:56:44 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“How do we do that, how do we win, how do we bring back the miracle that is America? #1. We reassemble the Reagan coalition. #2. We bring together fiscal conservatives and social conservatives and national security conservatives. We stand strong for economic growth, but we also stand for life and marriage. We defend the constitutional rights, but we also stand and lead the fight against ISIS and a nuclear Iran.”
Ted Cruz Ping!

If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.

Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!


CRUZ or LOSE!


23 posted on 02/27/2015 9:22:09 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

thanks for posting that- I’ll post the email his office sent- it sounded like in the email he was for regulations, but not the ‘dracononian regulations’ of the obmama administration

“Thank you for sharing your thoughts regarding the issue of climate change. Input from constituents significantly informs my decision-making and empowers me to better represent the state.

Many proposed legislative and regulatory remedies for climate change are draconian and would undermine job creation, raise electric rates and gasoline prices, and make American manufacturing less competitive. Ironically, they do little to reduce global production of greenhouse gases. I am committed to responsible environmental stewardship, but I cannot support measures that undermine our individual and economic freedoms by placing more control of our economy in the hands of unelected bureaucrats.

Texans have proven that we can have a strong economy and protect the environment, but they have also seen how the overbearing hand of federal environmental policy can harm jobs and opportunity. For these reasons, I oppose the proposals of President Obama, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and some in Congress to limit greenhouse gases without regard to jobs and the economy.

Thank you again for sharing your views with me. Please feel free to contact me in the future about any issue important to your family. It is an honor to serve you and the people of Texas.”

I wasn’;t too encouraged after reading that reply- sounded to me like he supports some kind of climate change/polution regulations


24 posted on 02/27/2015 2:46:43 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

-— More than any other likely Republican presidential candidate, Cruz is a salesman. -—

So different from Mr. “Yes We Can.”

It looks like they don’t have much on Mr. Cruz.


25 posted on 02/27/2015 2:53:45 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
I wasn’;t too encouraged after reading that reply- sounded to me like he supports some kind of climate change/polution regulations

No, it actually sounds like he supports common-sense protection of the environment. I am old enough to remember the bad-old-days of the chronic smog alerts of the 70's, and I don't want to go back to that. But he says nothing in that message to support the idea that he believes in "climate change" regulations of any kind.

26 posted on 02/27/2015 3:04:59 PM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

You don’t believe in mitigating pollution? Global Warming/Climate Change and Pollution are not necessarily the same thing. The smog in the Los Angeles area used to put me on the ground gasping during my childhood. That wasn’t some scam, that was real.


27 posted on 02/27/2015 3:16:20 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

[[You don’t believe in mitigating pollution?]]

Where did I say that?

[[Global Warming/Climate Change and Pollution are not necessarily the same thing. ]]

we don’t disagree there-

[[The smog in the Los Angeles area used to put me on the ground gasping during my childhood. That wasn’t some scam, that was real.]]

Never said it was-


28 posted on 02/27/2015 3:31:18 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative

you are correct, but he makes it sound like he would support regulation that takes jobs and the economy into account- it’s not what he said that had me concerned, it is what he didn’;t say that made me uncertain of his position- I had asked him how man could be responsible when man only contributes 0.0015% CO2 (that’s the total amount of CO2 I n the atmosphere due to man- nature produces the bulk of the 0.04% - an amount so small as to be nearly zero)- I got no answer from him concerning that basic question- but rather got a response that made it SEEM LIKE he would support legislation that took jobs and economy into account- Yes, he mentioned pollution regulations as well, but made it SEEM LIKE (not yelling just stressing the point) he would also support climate change regulations as well when he said,

“For these reasons, I oppose the proposals of President Obama, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and some in Congress to limit greenhouse gases without regard to jobs and the economy.”

it just seemed to me like he implied he would support ‘sensible climate change regulation’ and my basic question to him was how man can even be responsible for climate change when 1: CO2 does not cause warming 2: CO2 rises decades AFTER warming takes place, and 3: Man’s contribution is so small that even if CO2 could cause climate change, man simply was not capable of producing nearly enough to change the climate since we only contribute 0.0015% to the total atmospheric CO2-

I had hoped I was wrong about his stance on ‘man-caused’ climate change, but his response left me with an uneasy feeling for the reasons I mentioned-


29 posted on 02/27/2015 3:41:37 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson