Translation: They still have those gay bathhouse pics of Roberts and know there’s something hinky about his kids’ adoption papers.
Roberts will have to go further than a tropical island after he pulls this disaster off...The moon perhaps?
Well, we could fast & pray, but that is a suggestion not many do any more. But, with Lent season already in progress, maybe we could add a day of fasting each week for this.
That would be the destruction of the Supreme Court.
This is the reason Bush put him on the court. Many of the worst liberal justices have been nominated by Republicans.
Now, you tell me, why would Justice Roberts suddenly change his mind on OBAMA CARE? If he sees that there is a “FLAW” on how OBAMA CARE was written, he will help re-write the law, to make it more acceptable to the justices. Is there any one out there that doesn’t think that Justice Roberts is the “5th Column” in our Supreme Court?
Roberts did more than cast the deciding vote. He wrote an opinion that did backward flips to strain logic.
This case is going to come down to legislative history and the congressional record of what the legislature intended. The court will have lots of wiggle room if they want to perform acrobatics.
No one should get their hopes up. This case is far easier (really, a fastball right down the middle of the plate) for Roberts to “reason” his way around hurting this abomination of a law.
I am more optimistic on this decision. There is no hint for SCOTUS to be blamed of deciding a POTUS election again.
Swing.
What a wonderful word.
As in John Roberts swinging at the end of rope.
Tied to a lamp post outside of the SC building.
The USSC only provides us with a few small victories as a sop. On the big issues, they are controlled and do as they are told.
As everyone is aware, there is extensive gossip in the political community to the effect that Roberts and his wife have only two children who were adopted.
They were purportedly born in a foreign jurisdiction and there were in place legal constraints that effectively precluded US persons from adopting children born there under the circumstances of the Roberts adoption.
So to avoid those restrictions, the adoption was accomplished through the device of a third country system. Whether or not the third country worked to accomplish an effective adoption or not is not clear from the level of gossip in circulation.
The presumed threat is that the Roberts' could lose their two children several years down the road from the initial adoption events.
The end consequence of this condition, as reported by loose talk and political gossip, is that Roberts' vote on Obamacare was leveraged by the zero in the White House to uphold legislation that everyone knows is unconstitutional on its face.
I do not know what, if any, merit, substance, or facts exist to support the gossip.
I think it is and was the obligation of the Senate Judiciary Committee to know stuff like this. The gossip alone, unrefuted that it is by any authoritative response, affects confidence in our Constitutional process.
What should be done is that House Judiciary should immediately schedule a hearing on the issue and subpoena Justice Roberts to explain the actual facts.
Why House Judiciary instead of the Senate? Because that is where impeachment proceeding would be initiated. If this fairy tale is true, Roberts should be impeached immediately.
This statement should be bolded and circulated widely.
Frank's statement, while he may not have intended to be so "frank" (pun intended), is a statement of fact which indicates the sheer arrogance of the Obama-Reid-Pelosi team and their rubber stamp Democrats.
Arrogance and an underestimation of the intelligence and will of "the People" who are their bosses in the States brought about this "mistake" which the Supreme Court should not legitimize by allowing any other interpretation of the word "mistake" when applied to the abominable Trojan Horse legislation masked as having to do with health care in America.
Gruber's description, coming from a complicit architect of ACA, should be accepted as evidence of intent, and "the People" and "States" have spoken!
Last time, “Obamacare is not a tax” meant “Obamacare is a tax”. This time, “exchanges established by the states” might mean “exchanges established by FedGov”. If Chief Justice Roberts votes that way, it’s time to give up on peacefully restoring the rule of law. We will no longer be a constitutional republic, and FedGov will have no legitimacy. Only physical force can compel free Americans to obey an illegitimate government, and I’m not sure even FedGov force will be enough if the Court disregards the plain language of a terrible and destructive law.
I am sure they can find a foreign law or a evaporative pnumbra as the source that makes Obamacare okay.
UN elites supporting UN goals.
“It’s like deja vu all over again” Yogi Berra
SSDD
Besides, who really gives two shakes of a rat’s tail what the SCOTUS rules. Or for that matter, the entire government. I’ll do what I please, ignoring whatever laws I don’t like. Just like the half breed does.
Government’s favor = People’s disadvantage.
The libs always win so they will win again. The only time they don’t win is when it comes to higher taxes for wealthy and corporations. It seems like the country clubbers take conservative positions just to trade them off for these tax breaks. They prove Lenin’s, dictum, “the capitalist will sell the rope to his own hanging”.