“It figures. The reason is because Obama and his thieves only wanted the concept of a promise they made. They never understood the inanity of what they wrote, they don’t have one scintilla of an idea of how make it like they envisioned, it will not ever work or even stabilize while they keep changing the laws like they’re just ‘suggestions’.”
The SC will - maybe - fix the changing subsidy issue. Or not. Even though Kennedy, normally the swing vote, wrote the angry dissenting opinion when Roberts caved, I have no faith in how he or Roberts will rule this time.
The problems with PPACA (ObamaCare) go deeper than just a common scriveners error that can be easily corrected.
There are deep unending flaws and illegalities with it, IMO. And, tortuously objecting to calling it a tax, then calling it a tax when making an even more tortuously strained equivocation when ruling on its validity (Roberts) is contrivance and concoction of the highest order. Roberts can ill afford the hits he got again, IMO.
Kennedy? Who knows? Sometimes I think he just likes to throw a monkey wrench in things just to keep everyone guessing. He apparently likes the pandering to him.