Posted on 02/14/2015 3:57:10 PM PST by jazusamo
Social Security is surging to the forefront of the political debate ahead of the race for the White House in 2016.
The entitlement program has been thrust into the spotlight by a fight over the Social Security disability fund, which is expected to run dry by the end of next year.
The looming shortfall is stirring a burst of activism on the left, with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a likely 2016 candidate, and liberal hero Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) warning of an assault on the program from Republicans in Congress.
"We’ve known for years that Social Security Disability Insurance is set to run low in 2016, and most people assumed that another bipartisan reallocation was coming," Warren wrote Wednesday in an email to supporters. "But now, thanks to the Republican ideological war on our most important national safety net, disabled Americans could suddenly face a 20 percent cut in their Social Security checks next year."
Republicans have pushed back hard, and say they are the ones seeking to fix a broken program.
“The fact of the matter is, the Social Security Disability Insurance Trust Fund is going broke, going broke next year. Not in 2024, not in 2080, next year, 2016,” Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), the House budget chairman, told The Hill in an interview last month.
The battle over the disability fund is fueling a broader debate over Social Security and what should be done to prevent it from someday going insolvent.
Republicans are expected to put forward their own plans for reforming Social Security next month, when they introduce a new budget blueprint that they have promised will balance the books in 10 years.
But the extent to which Republicans will suggest changes to the retirement program — long known in Washington as the “third rail” of politics — as they seek to win back the White House and hold their congressional majorities remains unclear.
Democrats are eager for a confrontation over the program, having blasted House Republicans earlier this year for passing a rule that established a procedural hurdle that makes it more difficult to replenish the disability fund through a reallocation of the payroll tax.
Sanders, with his eye on a run for the White House, has seized on the issue to make the case for extending Social Security by raising taxes on the wealthy.
“If Republicans are serious about extending the solvency of Social Security beyond 2033, I hope they will join me in scrapping the cap that allows multi-millionaires to pay a much smaller percentage of their income into Social Security than the middle class,” Sanders said.
More than 59 million retired workers and nearly 9 million disabled people receive benefits from Social Security each month. The benefits are paid for by the payroll tax that employees and employers have to pay each month. The amount of earnings that are subject to the payroll tax is capped at $118,500.
Income above $118,500 is not subject to the payroll tax, which Sanders said is “patently unfair.”
“If we apply the Social Security payroll tax to income above $250,000, we could immediately bring in enough revenue to the Social Security trust fund to extend it for decades and also be able to increase benefits,” he said.
If Congress fails to act, payments from the disability fund would be cut by 20 percent in January 2017.
The retirement fund, meanwhile, is projected to run out of its reserves in 2033, forcing benefits to be reduced over time. In December, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that if Congress shifted resources from the retirement fund to the disability fund, both funds would be exhausted in 2030.
While those projections sound dire, Social Security could still pay around three-quarters of benefits for several more decades if it became insolvent.
The National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI), however, has found that most Americans don’t want to see any cuts to their benefits and are willing to pay more taxes in order to preserve the program.
In one of its surveys, 83 percent agreed with a proposal like Sanders’ that would raise Social Security taxes on top earners. That included 71 percent of Republicans, 92 percent of Democrats and 84 percent of independents.
Both parties have treaded carefully around the issue of Social Security in recent years, mindful of the backlash that President George W. Bush suffered in the mid-2000s when he pushed a plan to partially privatize the program.
President Obama took a political hit a few years ago when he proposed a switch to what is known as chained consumer price index (CPI) for Social Security, a formula that would likely result in cuts to benefits over time.
The White House scrapped the idea in its next budgets after Democrats skewered the plan.
Obama’s latest budget blueprint, meanwhile, asks Congress to reallocate the payroll tax to the disability fund, a proposal Republicans describe as “robbing Peter to pay Paul.”
At a hearing last week, Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) said she wants to see a “concrete proposal” from the White House that offers a long-term plan for Social Security.
The socialist Sanders running for the WH? LOL!
Immigrate to Venezulea, Bernie.
‘The Hill’ is attempting to divert the narrative to a democrat arena.
Won’t work.
Bernie would have a better chance running as Putin’s running mate. But, hopefully he will have a independent run for President. It would take many Democrat votes from Hillary.
You’re right, disability SS has become a joke and action has got to be taken to limit it to the truly disabled.
Yep.
You have to read carefully to see that the Dems want to raid SS for the funds for SSDI.
The Dems have raided SS for so long they don’t even know they’re doing it LOL!
No where in this article did they address the rampant fraud which skyrocketed in fredo dogeater’s watch
Correct, disability benefits have skyrocketed since 0bambam arrived.
So why didn’t the demoncrats fix this during the last 6 years?
For those that may not be aware, this is how this problem ACTUALLY began.
The ‘bent one’ and the hildabeast take great pride in mentioning how the bent one “ended” welfare during his term. What he actually did was spread it out over eighty (80) different Federal agencies and call it different names. When you put them all back together, welfare is of course larger than either social security and the military combined, or medicaid and the military combined. And comes pretty close to the total of all three. But not even the Republicans seem to want to talk about that.
In the various programs that were raped as part of this charade, none took it in the shorts as bad as the Social Security disability fund. Change the disability rules BACK to what they were in 1991 and the problem will virtually disappear.
But don't hold your breath for that to happen.
Obama’s deliberately signed up zillions of new receipients on SS Disability...who are, mostly anyway, not genuinely disabled by any reasonable use of that term.
Restore honesty to the program and its finances will suddenly improve substantially.
If you remember, Obama admin was putting people on disability who couldn’t get unemployment 5 years ago. Many of these people had mickey mouse reasons, but were getting disability even though they are not disabled.
The best way to fix this is for all states to to an anyalisis of people getting disability. Call them in for a retest. Start wih those under 45. I bet you could find a slew of fakers. Same with food stamps. Some got them a long time ago when they may have had a real problem, but that problem disappeared years ago and they are still getting free food.
I agree. Something like a start over and states do it would be a great way to do it. I also think that they need to walk to the Disability Office every month to pick up their checks............Extremely few exceptions. That would keep the counselors aware of who REALLY can’t work.
There is a lot of fraud in SS disability. You don’t have to name diseases...a lot is just fake.
We had a Marxist run and win.............twice.
True....Did you read my reply about requiring anyone on disability to have to go into the office to pick up a check. That would help some of them from getting it.
You got my vote.
lol. Thanks bud!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.